I am Imran, a retired Electrical Engineer with a QM question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the canonical commutation relation \([x, p] = i\hbar\) using basic calculus principles. The operators \(x\) and \(p\) are applied to a wave function \(f(x)\) in different orders, leading to the conclusion that \(px = -i\hbar + xp\). The momentum operator \(p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\) is explained through its action on plane waves, demonstrating that it returns the wave function multiplied by the momentum value \(p = \hbar k\). This understanding is crucial for formulating differential equations related to quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically commutation relations.
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly the product rule.
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their properties in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of plane waves and their relationship to momentum.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of the canonical commutation relations in quantum theory.
  • Learn about the role of operators in quantum mechanics, focusing on position and momentum operators.
  • Investigate the relationship between wave functions and their corresponding physical quantities, such as energy and frequency.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as educators looking to explain the foundational concepts of commutation relations and operator theory.

ImranM098
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi ,
Could somebody explain how to DERIVE the canonical postulate [Xcap,Pcap]=ihbar ? The idea of Pcap operator's origin as -ihbar d/dx also is found puzzling .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The canonical commutator ##[x, p] = i\hbar## can be derived with basic calculus (the product rule). We apply the operators x and p to a wave function f(x) in different orders and compare

$$px\,f(x) = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} x f(x) = -i\hbar (1+ x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x) ) = (-i\hbar + xp)f(x)$$

Since f(x) is arbitrary, we have determined

$$px = -i\hbar + xp$$
$$[x,p] = xp - px = i\hbar$$

The origin of ##p= -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}## can be understood by considering its action on plane waves. If we have a plane wave ##e^{ikx}##, then applying the momentum operator ##p## extracts a factor of k (k is called a wavenumber which is spatial frequency)

$$-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}e^{ikx} = -i\cdot i \hbar k \cdot e^{ikx} = \hbar k\,e^{ikx}$$

So when you apply the momentum operator to a plane wave it returns the same function times a factor of momentum ##p=\hbar k##. So the momentum operator gives a factor of the momentum value when operating on a plane wave.
This enables you to write a differential equation that will satisfy a relationship between variables such as wavenumber k, frequency, or energy. For some differential equations you can cancel the function on both sides of the equation and be left with an algebraic equation in terms of variables like frequency and energy. This is basically how Schrödinger arrived at his famous equation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory, Mentz114, fresh_42 and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
876
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K