I don't understand about infinitesimal translation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of infinitesimal translation in quantum mechanics, specifically referencing equations 1.6.12, 1.6.32, 1.6.35, and 1.6.36. It clarifies the relationship expressed in the limit as N approaches infinity, where the infinitesimal translation operator T(Δx) is represented as T(Δx/N)^N. The limit leads to an exponential form, demonstrating how a system can be displaced in N smaller steps. The discussion also emphasizes the operator's multiplication and its implications in the position representation of a wave function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with operator algebra in quantum physics
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
  • Basic grasp of limits and infinitesimals in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the exponential form of the translation operator in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of infinitesimal translations on wave functions
  • Learn about the role of the momentum operator in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of limits and infinitesimals in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, advanced physics students, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics and operator theory.

Another
Messages
104
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
I don't understand about infinitesimal translation
QM1.1.png


and
QM1.png


But

QM2.png


The infinitesimal translation denoted by equ 1.6.12 and 1.6.32

And then i understand about equation 1.6.35 but equation 1.6.36

Why they take limit N go to inf ? , multiply 1/ N ? and power N ?

So is the relationship below still true?

## F(Δ x'\hat{x}) = 1 - \frac{i p_x \dot{} Δ x'\hat{x} }{\bar{h}} = lim_{N → ∞} (1 - \frac{i p_x Δ x'}{N\bar{h}})^N ## ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to displace a system by ##\Delta x##, you can do that in ##N## smaller steps of ##\frac{\Delta x}{N}##. Each of these steps is carried out by the operator that translates a state by ##\frac{\Delta x}{N}##. Carrying out one operation after another is represented by operator multiplication. So, in simple notation:
$$T(\Delta x) = T(\frac{\Delta x}{N})^N$$
You can then imagine taking the limit of this as ##N \rightarrow \infty##. And, in this case, looking at the form that ##T(\frac{\Delta x}{N})## takes, the limit is an exponential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, etotheipi, Ishika_96_sparkles and 3 others
Another, maybe simpler, way is to realize that
$$\mathcal{T}(x+\mathrm{d} x) =\mathcal{T}(\mathrm{d} x) \mathcal{T}(x) $$
and thus (using natural units with ##\hbar=1##)
$$\mathcal{T}(x+\mathrm{d}x)-\mathcal{T}(x) = [\mathcal{T}(\mathrm{d} x)-1]\mathcal{T}(x) =-\mathrm{i}\hat{p} \mathrm{d} x \mathcal{T}(x)$$
or
$$\mathcal{T}'(x)=-\mathrm{i} \hat{p} \mathcal{T}(x) \; \Rightarrow \; \mathcal{T}(x)=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{p} x).$$
It's also realized easily in the position representation of a wave function [EDIT: Corrected in view of #4]:
$$\mathcal{T}(a) \psi(x)=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi(x) = \exp(-a \mathrm{d}_x) \psi(x) = (1-a \mathrm{d}x + a^2/2 \mathrm{d}_x^j+\cdots) \psi(x) = \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j!} (-a)^j \mathrm{d}_x^2 \psi(x)=\psi(x-a).$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Another and etotheipi
vanhees71 said:
It's also realized easily in the position representation of a wave function:
$$\mathcal{T}(a) \psi(x)=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{p} a) \psi(x) = \exp(-a \mathrm{d}_x) \psi(x) = (1-a \mathrm{d}x + a^2/2 \mathrm{d}_x^2 +\cdots) \psi(x) = \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j!} (-a)^j \mathrm{d}_x^2 \psi(x)=\psi(x-a).$$
Shouldn't the last part read as follows?

$$\mathcal{T}(a) \psi(x)=\exp(-a \mathrm{d}_x) \psi(x) = (1-a \mathrm{d}_x + (a^2/2!) \, \mathrm{d}_x^2 +\cdots) \psi(x) = \sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{j!} (-a)^j \mathrm{d}_x^j \psi(x)=\psi(x-a).$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Another
Sure, I'll correct it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Another, jim mcnamara and Ishika_96_sparkles

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K