I don't understand an assumption the textbook made ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter twotaileddemon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Griffith's electrodynamics textbook concerning the potential outside a grounded conducting sphere influenced by a point charge. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the assumption of an image charge and its relationship to the original charge.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the derivation of the image charge and its placement, seeking clarity on how such assumptions are made. Other participants suggest exploring the method of images and calculating potentials to understand the relationship between the charges.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the reasoning behind the image charge method. Some guidance has been provided regarding the calculation of potentials and the conditions for the charges, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's specific question.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a specific example from the textbook and expresses uncertainty about the assumptions made therein. The discussion includes considerations of boundary conditions and the implications of grounding the sphere.

twotaileddemon
Messages
258
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It comes from example 3.2 in griffith's 3rd edition electrodynamics book

A point charge q is situated a distance a from the center of a grounded conducting sphere of radius R. Find the potential outside the sphere.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I can follow the example, but it assumes that there is another point charge q' = -(R/a) * q, where q' is a distance b from the center (b = R^2/a) and q is a distance a from the center or a distance a-b from q'

My question is... where does it get such an assumption? Or, how does one know to chose such an arbitrary expression? I'm mostly interested in the relationship between the two charges... and how the charge q' (on the inside) is determined.

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually Griffiths does explain that, at the bottom of that page (the paragraph below (3.18)). You can try the method he explains: take any charge q' at any position x' and calculate the resulting potential, and see which q' and x' to choose to recover (3.17) or (3.19).

Usually, if the location of the image charge is not obvious from the problem, a hint will be given. If you have any arbitrary problem, first try with a single image charge, and check if it does the job. If not, you can go further but probably the method of images isn't such a good idea at all.
 
So I should calculate the potential between q and q'...

ok, I get that.
But even if the potential is given, if I integrated using the equation V = -I(E.dl) where I is integral E is the electric field and . is the dot product, would I get the same result for V?

and once I get the potential.. since the sphere is grounded.. I can set it equal to zero and solve for q' in terms of q?
 
I don't really get what you are asking, sorry.
You have one point charge given, and the potential at the boundaries of some area of space (namely, at the surface of the sphere and at infinity). The idea is that you replace the sphere by one (or more) charge(s) outside that region (in this case, inside the sphere) in such a way that the potential on the boundary and charge distributions inside the region are unchanged. Then the potential and derived quantities (such as the electric field) are the same in the original and new case.

So in this case, you would replace the sphere with a charge q' somewhere inside the region where the sphere was, and calculate the position and magnitude of q' such that the potentials of q and q' together vanish at distance R from the origin.
 
okay, I understand it now. thanks very much :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
772
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K