High School I with a related rates question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical modeling of a spherical snowball melting at a rate proportional to its surface area. The participants derive the relationship between the rate of change of the radius (dr/dt) and the melting rate (dV/dt), concluding that dr/dt equals a constant (c). Key equations include dV/dt = c * S and S = 4πr², leading to the simplification that dr/dt = c when surface area is factored out. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between volume and surface area in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation and rates of change.
  • Familiarity with the geometric formulas for the volume and surface area of a sphere.
  • Knowledge of proportional relationships in mathematical modeling.
  • Basic concepts of multivariable calculus (optional for deeper understanding).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between volume and surface area in spherical objects.
  • Learn about differential equations and their applications in modeling physical phenomena.
  • Explore the concept of proportionality in mathematical functions and its implications.
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on the melting rate of materials.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, physics enthusiasts, and educators looking to enhance their understanding of rates of change in physical contexts, particularly in relation to geometric shapes.

MrDickinson
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A spherical snowball melts at a rate proportional to its surface area. Show that the rate of change of the radius is constant.

Two ratios are proportional if they change equally and are related by a constant of proportionality? Not sure about this definition, but please correct it if you can.

My initial thoughts were to set up an equation and differentiate it with respect to time.

S=surface area, r=radius, k=constant of proportionality

S=4pir^2=s

(dS/dt)=2*4*pi*r*(dr/dt)

(dr/dt)=[(dS/dt)]/[(8pir)]

At this point, I do not know what to do.

The words I am using to describe the situation: The rate at which the snowball melts (dS/dt) is proportional to the radius. So the radius is the constant of proportionality? I am thinking that we should have something like the following: (d/s/dt)=constant of proportionality*surface area?

I am not sure how to understand this problem.

Please explain the problem. There is nothing worse than a teacher that does a bunch of math on a chalkboard, gives the most minute explanation, and calls it teaching (just my opinion)

Please use words and explain what is happening. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that the rate of melting is ##\frac{dV(r,t)}{dt} = c \cdot S(r,t) \sim 4\pi r(t)^2## for some constant ##c##. Do you know how volume ##V## and surface ##S## are related?
 
fresh_42 said:
You know that the rate of melting is ##\frac{dV(r,t)}{dt} = c \cdot S(r,t) \sim 4\pi r(t)^2## for some constant ##c##. Do you know how volume ##V## and surface ##S## are related?
The derivative of volume is equal to surface area?
 
MrDickinson said:
The derivative of volume is equal to surface area?
Also, I do not understand your notation. Can you please use words?

It seems that you are saying that the derivative of volume at some arbitrary time for some arbitrary radius (with respect to time) is equal to some constant of proportionality multiplied by the surface area at some arbitrary time for some arbitrary radius. It seems that you are also implying that surface area is a function of r and t and changes as r and t change. I have not taken multivariable calculus...
 
MrDickinson said:
The derivative of volume is equal to surface area?
Yep! And with respect to what? I used the same notation as you did, only an additional ##\sim## to indicate proportionality.
If you write your answer above in terms of the Leibniz notation as you did with the surface and add my equation which is given by the exercise, then you will only have to rearrange the terms.
 
  • Like
Likes MrDickinson
fresh_42 said:
Yep! And with respect to what? I used the same notation as you did, only an additional ##\sim## to indicate proportionality.
If you write your answer above in terms of the Leibniz notation as you did with the surface and add my equation which is given by the exercise, then you will only have to rearrange the terms.
I see. I will research your notation in a bit to try to understand how they are equal to mine.

I was just working on this again and I think I see where you are going... but it slipped my mind... The volume of the snowball melts at a rate proportional to the surface area. I am still struggling to use this information. So dr/dt is the constant of proportionality? I still do not understand this problem...

Also, out of curiosity, is the problem true if and only if the surface temperature of the snowball is constant? It seems that the rate of change of volume is going to depend heavily on temperature..

If you solve for the given information, you get 1/(4pir^2)=dr/dt. But isn't r changing?
 
MrDickinson said:
I see. I will research your notation in a bit to try to understand how they are equal to mine.
##V## is simply sloppy for ##V(r,t)## or even more precisely ##V(r(t),t)##. The same with ##S##. Since we have two variables to consider, radius and time, it is as saying ##f(x)## which you are probably used to. The ##\sim## sign to state something is proportional might be a bit of a personal taste. I'm not quite sure about that.

I was just working on this again and I think I see where you are going... but it slipped my mind... The volume of the snowball melts at a rate proportional to the surface area. I am still struggling to use this information. So dr/dt is the constant of proportionality? I still do not understand this problem...

Also, out of curiosity, is the problem true if and only if the surface temperature of the snowball is constant? It seems that the rate of change of volume is going to depend heavily on temperature..

If you solve for the given information, you get 1/(4pir^2)=dr/dt. But isn't r changing?
Forget about the ##4\pi r^2##. You know ##\frac{dV}{dt} = \text{ melting rate of snowball } = c \cdot S## as given in the text. Then you know, as you have said, ##\frac{dV}{dr} = S##. If you treat the fractions as normal fractions of numbers, you will find ##\frac{dr}{dt}##. (Assuming you know what ##\frac{d}{dV}V## is.) This is a bit of a hand waving method, but I thought: Hey, it's a physics forum, so why to complicate things. :wink:

(Hopefully they won't hit me for this remark ...:nb))
 
fresh_42 said:
##V## is simply sloppy for ##V(r,t)## or even more precisely ##V(r(t),t)##. The same with ##S##. Since we have two variables to consider, radius and time, it is as saying ##f(x)## which you are probably used to. The ##\sim## sign to state something is proportional might be a bit of a personal taste. I'm not quite sure about that.Forget about the ##4\pi r^2##. You know ##\frac{dV}{dt} = \text{ melting rate of snowball } = c \cdot S## as given in the text. Then you know, as you have said, ##\frac{dV}{dr} = S##. If you treat the fractions as normal fractions of numbers, you will find ##\frac{dr}{dt}##. (Assuming you know what ##\frac{d}{dV}V## is.) This is a bit of a hand waving method, but I thought: Hey, it's a physics forum, so why to complicate things. :wink:

(Hopefully they won't hit me for this remark ...:nb))

I understand what you are saying; however, multivariable calculus goes beyond the scope of my education and the discussion. Conceptually, I understand what you getting at. Notice that the question is slotted as a beginning level calculus question, not a third semester college calculus question.

Anyway, we have (dv/dt)=cS

dv/dt=4pir^2(dr/dt)

4pir^2(dr/dt)=c(4pir^2)

Multiply through by (1/4pir^2) and we have dr/dt=c

Thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
717
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K