Undergrad I need integrals Int[0,infty]t^(a-1) e^(-t) F(z, e^(-t))dt

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding integrals of the form ∫[0,∞] t^(α-1) e^(-t) F(z, e^(-t)) dt, where z and α are complex parameters, and the resulting function G(z, α) is known. Participants are encouraged to share interesting examples, including simpler cases, with one user referencing the Gamma function as a relevant example. The conversation also touches on the Mellin transform and its application to the integral, with suggestions for defining a new function H(z, t) to facilitate the analysis. The need for clarity on how to handle the compound function within the integral is emphasized, highlighting the complexity of the transformations involved. Overall, the thread seeks collaborative insights into integral transformations and their applications.
benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
TL;DR
I need your integrals which are interesting, of the form Int[0,infty]t^(a-1) e^(-t) F(z, e^(-t))dt and that possess known analytical solutions please?
I’m doing some brainstorming for a note I’m writing, I would appreciate it if anybody knows interesting integrals of the form

$$\int_{t=0}^\infty t^{\alpha - 1} e^{-t} F(z, e^{-t})\, dt=G( z, \alpha )$$

where ##z## and ##\alpha## are complex parameters and the solution ##G(z, \alpha )## is known? Even if they seem kinda simple ones, example:

$$\int_{t=0}^\infty t^{\alpha - 1} e^{-t} \cos (t)\, dt= 2^{\tfrac{-\alpha}{2}}\cos \left(\tfrac{\pi}{4}\alpha\right) \Gamma (\alpha )$$

@fresh_42 you always come up with those juicy integrals - if you’re able maybe come post one? Thanks.

If I end up using any of the integrals you guys come up with I will cite this thread and your handle or real name if you prefer?

-Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems Mellin transform of ##e^{-t} F##.  
F=e^t M^{-1}\{G\}
where ##M^{-1}## is inverse Mellin transform.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes benorin and Delta2
anuttarasammyak said:
It seems Mellin transform of ##e^{-t} F##.  
F=e^t M^{-1}\{G\}
where ##M^{-1}## is inverse Mellin transform.
This is a good observation, thank you, but I don't understand how the compound function is accounted for in this? I mean the ##e^{-t}## inside ##F( z, e^{-t})## inside the integral transform in the first post? I am uncertain how to work with this feature, I suppose I could simply define another function ##H( z,t) := F( z, e^{-t} )## and use that somehow. How would I use a table of transforms for this kind of function?
 
I am not sure whether I got you but
e^tM^{-1}\{G{(z,\alpha} )\}:= H(z,t)
H(z,t)=H(z,-\log(e^{-t}))=F(z,e^{-t}).
by substituting t with -log(e^-t) in H.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K