I think I'm making this problem way too complicated than it really is.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bearhug
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the mass of water on Earth based on its surface area and average depth. The original poster attempts to calculate this using surface area and depth measurements, but expresses uncertainty about their result.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of calculating the mass of water by determining surface area and volume, with questions about unit conversions and arithmetic accuracy. Some suggest reviewing the calculations for potential errors.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, offering insights and prompting a review of the work. There is acknowledgment of a possible arithmetic or unit conversion error, but no consensus has been reached on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions using a computer program for calculations, which may introduce additional considerations regarding input and output formats. There is also a note about the potential complexity of the problem as perceived by the poster.

bearhug
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Assuming that 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered with water at an average depth of 2.1 mi, estimate the mass of the water on the Earth in kilograms.

What I originally did for this problem was find the total surface area of the Earth to be 1.97e8 mi^2 and multiplied by 0.71 to get the water's surface area to be 1.40e8mi^2. Then I multiplied that to 2.1 mi to get volume and found mass using D= m/V and converting to kg. The answer I got was 1.22e15 kg and it's wrong. (This is done on a computer program). I'm not sure if my math is wrong or if I'm making it a lot more complicated than it really is.

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like the correct approach to me. What did you use to get the surface area of the earth? You are mixing units in your explanation of your work -- did you use the correct conversion factors? Maybe post a more complete listing of your work, and we can see if anything pops out at us.


EDIT -- not really "mixing" units...I misspoke. Maybe it's an error in the mass/Volume part?
 
You seem to have the correct approach, but perhaps you made an arithmetic or unit conversion error. I get this:

Surface area of Earth: 5.1 × 1014 m2
Volume of oceans: 1.2 × 1018 m3
Mass of oceans: 1.2 × 1021 kilograms

- Warren
 
Last edited:
After looking at all replies I checked my math again and got what chroot got, 1.2x10^21 kg thanks for the help, at least I know that I understand the problem. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K