I tried to build a radio receiver

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on building a radio receiver using a TS832 transmitter and an RS832 receiver. The user attempted to create an antenna by cutting a copper wire to 8.8 centimeters but failed to receive a signal, with multimeter readings mostly at zero. Experts in the forum suggested that the antenna's length should be approximately 12.9 centimeters, corresponding to a quarter wavelength at 5.8 GHz, and emphasized the importance of matching the antenna's impedance to around 50 Ohms for optimal performance. Additionally, concerns were raised about legal implications of modifying antennas for increased range.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of antenna theory and impedance matching
  • Familiarity with multimeter usage and measurements
  • Knowledge of radio frequency (RF) principles, particularly at 5.8 GHz
  • Basic electronics skills, including working with copper wire and connectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Antenna Design for 5.8 GHz" to understand optimal lengths and materials
  • Learn about "Impedance Matching Techniques" to ensure proper signal transmission
  • Explore "Twin Wire Transmission Line Calculators" for accurate antenna design
  • Investigate legal regulations regarding the modification of radio equipment and antennas
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, hobbyists in radio frequency projects, and individuals interested in antenna design and optimization.

David lopez
Messages
257
Reaction score
3
i have ts832 transmitter and a rs832 receiver. i tried to build a radio receiver to pick up radio signals from the ts832 transmitter,. i measured the ts832's antenna. it was 8.8 centimeters. so i cut a piece of copper wire 8.8 centimeters long. i connected the bottom of the copper wire to two other wires. 1 wire was connected to the black prong of a multimeter. the other wire was connected to the red prong of the multimeter. i set the multimeter to 200 milliamps. i don't think i got a signal. most of the time the multimeter read zero. sometimes the multimeter, read 0.1 or 0.2 or 4. it uses the 5.8 cm band. how do i build an antenna that can pick up a radio signal from this ts832?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My first guess would be there's a mismatch between your wire that you're using as an antenna and the board or connector. I would be surprised if they didn't choose a thickness/width, shape to those antennas beyond its length to achieve a certain characteristic impedance (often 50 Ohms). Quick note just in case readers might not be familiar, that resistance, impedance, and characteristic impedance are not the same. Would you be able to try another wire that has a different diameter compared to your first one?

I've heard stories of people mucking around with coat hangers until they can get it to pick up a signal. I'm not sure you'll be so lucky if the TS832 really is 5.8 GHz (I'm looking at https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00MLS0NOW/?tag=pfamazon01-20). You could try. I'm no expert with antennas, but I thought the length should be like 12.9 cm if it's just copper in air... I chose that number because it's λ/4...
 
so you think i should use 12.9 cm and a different diameter? should i use a thicker diameter or a thinner diameter?
 
David lopez said:
i have ts832 transmitter and a rs832 receiver
You mean RC832 ? With an antenna ? Why not use that ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Let's try it in steps and just do the length first. You might be able to get something from it.

This isn't my area of expertise (antennas that is), but I would try approximately a twin wire transmission line and impedance match roughly using that. I'd use an online calculator like this with a dielectric constant of 1 (vacuum or air), and a permeability constant of 1 (as long as it's not nickel, iron...). Measure the spacing between the terminals for input 3 and choose a few different diameters until you can get about 50 Ohms.

https://www.rfwireless-world.com/calculators/Twin-wire-line-calculator.html
 
so make sure the antenna has 50 ohms?
 
That's what I would try.
 
so make sure the resistance of the copper wire is 50 ohm?
 
@David lopez you have not answered the question by @BvU
BvU said:
You mean RC832 ? With an antenna ? Why not use that ?
1580782833639.png

If you have a complete receiver for this link testing, why are you trying to make your own antenna?

David lopez said:
so make sure the antenna has 50 ohms?
If you have one of these:

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/k08AAOSwrdlcaD3b/s-l300.jpg

1580782924443.png
 
  • #10
BvU said:
You mean RC832 ? With an antenna ? Why not use that ?
because i am trying to get more range. an antenna picks up the radio signals from ts832 transmitter and sends the signal to a second antenna that will retransmit the signal at higher frequency to get longer range.
 
  • #11
you still have not answered my question, so i make sure the piece of copper wire has a resistance of 50 ohms?
 
  • #12
David lopez said:
you still have not answered my question, so i make sure the piece of copper wire has a resistance of 50 ohms?
Of course not, since your question is nonsense, yet again. You are trying to learn, and that is a good thing. But you are stumbling around in areas where you can cause harmful communication interference to others, and that is not good.

And even though you are finally trying to use canned transmitters and receivers for your projects, you are asking us for help violating the law by replacing the standard monopole antennas with high gain Yagi antennas, which will likely violate the Tx power testing that was done on those licensed transmitters.

As much as I admire your desire to learn and do EE projects, it is time you had a brief vacation from the PF. We do not tolerate repeated efforts to violate the law.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Averagesupernova, BvU and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K