I with a related rates question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a related rates problem involving a spherical snowball melting at a rate proportional to its surface area. Participants explore the relationships between the surface area, volume, and the rate of change of the radius, seeking clarification on the underlying concepts and mathematical relationships.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definition of proportionality and expresses uncertainty about the relationships between the surface area and the radius.
  • Another participant states that the rate of melting is proportional to the surface area and asks if the participant understands how volume and surface area are related.
  • There is a repeated assertion that the derivative of volume is equal to surface area, prompting requests for clarification on notation and concepts.
  • Some participants express confusion about the implications of the melting rate and whether the constant of proportionality relates to the rate of change of the radius.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions of the problem, particularly regarding the influence of temperature on the melting rate.
  • A participant suggests that treating the fractions as normal numbers could lead to finding the rate of change of the radius, although this approach is described as somewhat informal.
  • There is acknowledgment that the discussion may exceed the expected level of understanding for a beginning calculus question, with references to multivariable calculus concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the relationships between the variables involved. Some participants agree on the proportionality of the melting rate to surface area, while others remain uncertain about the implications and the mathematical treatment of the problem. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of multivariable calculus and the assumptions underlying the problem, particularly regarding temperature effects on the melting rate. The discussion reflects a range of mathematical notations and interpretations that may contribute to confusion.

MrDickinson
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A spherical snowball melts at a rate proportional to its surface area. Show that the rate of change of the radius is constant.

Two ratios are proportional if they change equally and are related by a constant of proportionality? Not sure about this definition, but please correct it if you can.

My initial thoughts were to set up an equation and differentiate it with respect to time.

S=surface area, r=radius, k=constant of proportionality

S=4pir^2=s

(dS/dt)=2*4*pi*r*(dr/dt)

(dr/dt)=[(dS/dt)]/[(8pir)]

At this point, I do not know what to do.

The words I am using to describe the situation: The rate at which the snowball melts (dS/dt) is proportional to the radius. So the radius is the constant of proportionality? I am thinking that we should have something like the following: (d/s/dt)=constant of proportionality*surface area?

I am not sure how to understand this problem.

Please explain the problem. There is nothing worse than a teacher that does a bunch of math on a chalkboard, gives the most minute explanation, and calls it teaching (just my opinion)

Please use words and explain what is happening. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that the rate of melting is ##\frac{dV(r,t)}{dt} = c \cdot S(r,t) \sim 4\pi r(t)^2## for some constant ##c##. Do you know how volume ##V## and surface ##S## are related?
 
fresh_42 said:
You know that the rate of melting is ##\frac{dV(r,t)}{dt} = c \cdot S(r,t) \sim 4\pi r(t)^2## for some constant ##c##. Do you know how volume ##V## and surface ##S## are related?
The derivative of volume is equal to surface area?
 
MrDickinson said:
The derivative of volume is equal to surface area?
Also, I do not understand your notation. Can you please use words?

It seems that you are saying that the derivative of volume at some arbitrary time for some arbitrary radius (with respect to time) is equal to some constant of proportionality multiplied by the surface area at some arbitrary time for some arbitrary radius. It seems that you are also implying that surface area is a function of r and t and changes as r and t change. I have not taken multivariable calculus...
 
MrDickinson said:
The derivative of volume is equal to surface area?
Yep! And with respect to what? I used the same notation as you did, only an additional ##\sim## to indicate proportionality.
If you write your answer above in terms of the Leibniz notation as you did with the surface and add my equation which is given by the exercise, then you will only have to rearrange the terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MrDickinson
fresh_42 said:
Yep! And with respect to what? I used the same notation as you did, only an additional ##\sim## to indicate proportionality.
If you write your answer above in terms of the Leibniz notation as you did with the surface and add my equation which is given by the exercise, then you will only have to rearrange the terms.
I see. I will research your notation in a bit to try to understand how they are equal to mine.

I was just working on this again and I think I see where you are going... but it slipped my mind... The volume of the snowball melts at a rate proportional to the surface area. I am still struggling to use this information. So dr/dt is the constant of proportionality? I still do not understand this problem...

Also, out of curiosity, is the problem true if and only if the surface temperature of the snowball is constant? It seems that the rate of change of volume is going to depend heavily on temperature..

If you solve for the given information, you get 1/(4pir^2)=dr/dt. But isn't r changing?
 
MrDickinson said:
I see. I will research your notation in a bit to try to understand how they are equal to mine.
##V## is simply sloppy for ##V(r,t)## or even more precisely ##V(r(t),t)##. The same with ##S##. Since we have two variables to consider, radius and time, it is as saying ##f(x)## which you are probably used to. The ##\sim## sign to state something is proportional might be a bit of a personal taste. I'm not quite sure about that.

I was just working on this again and I think I see where you are going... but it slipped my mind... The volume of the snowball melts at a rate proportional to the surface area. I am still struggling to use this information. So dr/dt is the constant of proportionality? I still do not understand this problem...

Also, out of curiosity, is the problem true if and only if the surface temperature of the snowball is constant? It seems that the rate of change of volume is going to depend heavily on temperature..

If you solve for the given information, you get 1/(4pir^2)=dr/dt. But isn't r changing?
Forget about the ##4\pi r^2##. You know ##\frac{dV}{dt} = \text{ melting rate of snowball } = c \cdot S## as given in the text. Then you know, as you have said, ##\frac{dV}{dr} = S##. If you treat the fractions as normal fractions of numbers, you will find ##\frac{dr}{dt}##. (Assuming you know what ##\frac{d}{dV}V## is.) This is a bit of a hand waving method, but I thought: Hey, it's a physics forum, so why to complicate things. :wink:

(Hopefully they won't hit me for this remark ...:nb))
 
fresh_42 said:
##V## is simply sloppy for ##V(r,t)## or even more precisely ##V(r(t),t)##. The same with ##S##. Since we have two variables to consider, radius and time, it is as saying ##f(x)## which you are probably used to. The ##\sim## sign to state something is proportional might be a bit of a personal taste. I'm not quite sure about that.Forget about the ##4\pi r^2##. You know ##\frac{dV}{dt} = \text{ melting rate of snowball } = c \cdot S## as given in the text. Then you know, as you have said, ##\frac{dV}{dr} = S##. If you treat the fractions as normal fractions of numbers, you will find ##\frac{dr}{dt}##. (Assuming you know what ##\frac{d}{dV}V## is.) This is a bit of a hand waving method, but I thought: Hey, it's a physics forum, so why to complicate things. :wink:

(Hopefully they won't hit me for this remark ...:nb))

I understand what you are saying; however, multivariable calculus goes beyond the scope of my education and the discussion. Conceptually, I understand what you getting at. Notice that the question is slotted as a beginning level calculus question, not a third semester college calculus question.

Anyway, we have (dv/dt)=cS

dv/dt=4pir^2(dr/dt)

4pir^2(dr/dt)=c(4pir^2)

Multiply through by (1/4pir^2) and we have dr/dt=c

Thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K