Ibach Luth - Solid State 1.11 (QM model for Van der Waals' equation )

DrPhysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Ibach Luth Solid State 1-11
Relevant Equations
Quantum Mechanical model for VanDerWalls equation
Hi Everyone, can you guys please help me with the exercise attached?

I knot that according to the book, van der Waals interaction is “charge fluctuations in atoms due to zero point motion.”

This is correct once you understand that they are not talking about zero point motion of nuclear coordinates, but of electron behavior.

I'm trying to complete the answers, but I'm stucked. Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • QUESTÃO 1.png
    QUESTÃO 1.png
    63.3 KB · Views: 207
Physics news on Phys.org
To start to visualise what's going on, you have two protons (##+e##) separated by a distance ##R## and whose masses are so large compared to the two electrons (##-e##) that they can be assumed to remain stationary. The picture looks like:

1616780524881.png


The electrons are at ##x_1## and ##x_2## respectively relative to their corresponding protons; can you write down the total energy of the two oscillators? The energy of each oscillator will consist of the kinetic energy of the electron and the potential energy of the dipole. That will be ##\mathscr{H}_1##.

Note that, in working out ##\mathscr{H}_2##, the question assumes you're using Gaussian units.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top