Ibach Luth - Solid State 1.11 (QM model for Van der Waals' equation )

DrPhysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Ibach Luth Solid State 1-11
Relevant Equations
Quantum Mechanical model for VanDerWalls equation
Hi Everyone, can you guys please help me with the exercise attached?

I knot that according to the book, van der Waals interaction is “charge fluctuations in atoms due to zero point motion.”

This is correct once you understand that they are not talking about zero point motion of nuclear coordinates, but of electron behavior.

I'm trying to complete the answers, but I'm stucked. Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • QUESTÃO 1.png
    QUESTÃO 1.png
    63.3 KB · Views: 214
Physics news on Phys.org
To start to visualise what's going on, you have two protons (##+e##) separated by a distance ##R## and whose masses are so large compared to the two electrons (##-e##) that they can be assumed to remain stationary. The picture looks like:

1616780524881.png


The electrons are at ##x_1## and ##x_2## respectively relative to their corresponding protons; can you write down the total energy of the two oscillators? The energy of each oscillator will consist of the kinetic energy of the electron and the potential energy of the dipole. That will be ##\mathscr{H}_1##.

Note that, in working out ##\mathscr{H}_2##, the question assumes you're using Gaussian units.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top