IceCube search for the 'sterile neutrino' draws a blank

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kodama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino Search
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The IceCube neutrino observatory has reported null results regarding the sterile neutrino hypothesis, contributing to the ongoing discourse in Beyond Standard Model (BSM) physics. Key findings include the inability to detect sterile neutrinos, which, alongside other null results such as those from LUX and PandaX experiments, suggest that dark matter may not consist of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) or sterile neutrinos. The implications of these findings necessitate a reevaluation of existing models and the exploration of alternative dark matter candidates, such as relict keV mass particles and self-interacting dark matter. The discussion emphasizes the importance of refining theoretical frameworks in light of experimental constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sterile neutrinos and their role in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the IceCube neutrino observatory and its detection capabilities
  • Knowledge of dark matter candidates, including WIMPs and self-interacting dark matter
  • Awareness of the implications of null results in experimental physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the LUX and PandaX null results on dark matter theories
  • Explore the concept of self-interacting dark matter and its potential candidates
  • Investigate the role of right-handed neutrinos in extending the Standard Model
  • Examine the statistical significance of experimental anomalies related to sterile neutrinos
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and anyone involved in the study of dark matter and neutrino physics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on BSM theories and experimental results.

  • #31
kodama said:
feng proposes his boson is a spin-1 vector boson with axial and vectorlike currents

Nonzero-spin fields with nonzero VEV break Lorentz invariance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kodama
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
nikkkom said:
Nonzero-spin fields with nonzero VEV break Lorentz invariance.

perhaps this boson has zero VEV to preserve Lorentz invariance
 
  • #33
Then how it generates neutrino mass?
 
  • #34
nikkkom said:
Then how it generates neutrino mass?

if there is more than 1 higgs field, perhaps neutrinos couple to a second set of higgs
 
  • #35
nikkkom said:
Higgs-like coupling (IOW: fermion to scalar field coupling) would require existence of RH neutrinos.

Depends on how "Higgs-like" it has to be. I don't see anything wrong in principle with a scalar field that couples only to left handed particles and thereby generates mass. It wouldn't be very Higgs-like, compared to the SM, but shouldn't be mathematically impossible.
 
  • #36
kodama said:
what kind of dark matter is left?

Fuzzy dark matter.

W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, “Cold and fuzzy dark matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1158–1161 (2000), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0003365

One of the big conundrums is that the assumption of dark matter works extremely well on large scales for explaining the structure of the cosmos, but seems to fail to work on the scale of galaxies. One interesting idea how to fix this (without giving up on the established theory of gravity as MOND does) is to assume that dark matter consists of massive but extremely light particles, whose de Broglie wavelength is of the order of thousands of parsecs. This has the consequence that at around the scale of that wavelength the behaviour of this dark matter changes.

Now Edward Witten et al. have argued in more detail that this works really well, and consistent with existing null results on direct detection:

Lam Hui, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Scott Tremaine, Edward Witten, "On the hypothesis that cosmological dark matter is composed of ultra-light bosons" https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08297
 
  • #37
[URL='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/author/urs-schreiber/']Urs Schreiber[/URL] said:
Fuzzy dark matter.

W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, “Cold and fuzzy dark matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1158–1161 (2000), https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0003365

One of the big conundrums is that the assumption of dark matter works extremely well on large scales for explaining the structure of the cosmos, but seems to fail to work on the scale of galaxies. One interesting idea how to fix this (without giving up on the established theory of gravity as MOND does) is to assume that dark matter consists of massive but extremely light particles, whose de Broglie wavelength is of the order of thousands of parsecs. This has the consequence that at around the scale of that wavelength the behaviour of this dark matter changes.

Now Edward Witten et al. have argued in more detail that this works really well, and consistent with existing null results on direct detection:

Lam Hui, Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Scott Tremaine, Edward Witten, "On the hypothesis that cosmological dark matter is composed of ultra-light bosons" https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08297

does this fuzzy dark matter couple to higgs?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K