Ideal Heat Engine: Input Temp Change, Exhaust Temp Change?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an ideal heat engine with specific input and exhaust temperatures. The original poster is attempting to determine how much the exhaust temperature must be lowered to maintain the same efficiency after a change in the input temperature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of efficiency using the formula η = 1 - (Tc/Th) and express confusion regarding the correctness of the original poster's result. There are questions about the clarity of the calculations and the algebraic rearrangement needed to solve the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the algebraic formulation of the problem. There is recognition that the original poster's method may yield the correct temperature by coincidence, and further clarification on the steps involved is being sought.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a potential "Carnot limit" and express uncertainty about temperature constraints, indicating a need for clarification on assumptions related to the problem setup.

cuddlylover
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
An ideal heat engine operates with an input temperature of 327C and an exhaust temperature
of 27C. If the input temperature is lowered to 227C, by how much must be the exhaust
temperature be lowered to maintain the same eciency?Im using η= 1-(tc/th) that works out to 1-(300k/600k) = 0.5 then took 227c = 500k*0.5 =250 ∴ 1-(250k/500k)=0.5

So i come to -23c but that dose not seem right if someone can help me here would be a big help thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks right to me. Why did you think it was incorrect? On another note, your working seems a bit unclear. I see you calculate the original efficiency, and I understand that bit of the working. But then I don't follow the rest of it.
 
I worked out the original efficiency and then times the original efficiency by input temperature 2 to get the exhaust temperature 2.

Is that not right how would you do the working?

I was thinking it was incorrect base on a feeling there is a carnot limit of about 10C but i mite be wrong :)
 
cuddlylover said:
I worked out the original efficiency and then times the original efficiency by input temperature 2 to get the exhaust temperature 2.

Is that not right how would you do the working?
No, this is not the correct working. But it happens to get the right answer in this case just by coincidence. I think you need to take more time to rearrange the equations properly. You have two equations: old efficiency and new efficiency, and you know these are equal. How would you write this algebraically?

cuddlylover said:
I was thinking it was incorrect base on a feeling there is a carnot limit of about 10C but i mite be wrong :)
there is no temperature limit (apart from absolute zero, but that's much less than 10C)
 
cuddlylover said:
So i come to -23c but that dose not seem right if someone can help me here would be a big help thanks
You have to answer the question. The question asks by how much must the temperature of the exhaust be lowered, not to what temperature it must be lowered. Apart from that, I think you have the right idea.

AM
 
Oh, that's right. That is the last step which I forgot about as well. Cuddlylover still needs to do the correct working also.
 
How would i write and do this algebraically?
 
cuddlylover said:
How would i write and do this algebraically?

Write the expression for efficiency of the engine in the second case in terms of the input and exhaust temperatures (using Qc for the exhaust temp). Set that to the efficiency of the engine in the first case. Solve for Qc.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K