Ideas requested for making distant air visible

  • Thread starter Thread starter pyroartist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Ideas
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on methods to visualize distant air using aerosols as tracers, particularly focusing on LIDAR technology. The challenges include the high cost of powerful lasers and the need for large telescopes for effective detection. Suggestions include using passive systems with daylight, exploring near-infrared visibility of aerosols, and considering frequency-swept LIDAR systems for scatterer density analysis. Participants emphasize the importance of clearly defining the goal of the project to facilitate better solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of LIDAR technology and its applications
  • Knowledge of aerosol properties and their interaction with light
  • Familiarity with optical systems, including telescope specifications
  • Experience with infrared spectroscopy and its relevance to chemical species
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the capabilities and limitations of frequency-swept LIDAR systems
  • Explore the use of passive optical systems for aerosol detection
  • Investigate the properties of aerosols in the near-infrared spectrum
  • Learn about the design and implementation of drone-based sampling systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for researchers in atmospheric science, engineers developing remote sensing technologies, and hobbyists interested in building systems for air quality monitoring.

pyroartist
Messages
50
Reaction score
6
This is a really tough problem. I have spent years studying and experimenting about this. Outdoor air contains tracers such as dust, pollen, etc. called aerosols. It is possible to use LIDAR to detect these at distances in the scale of kilometers away. But lasers of the power to use at even 1km. are very expensive and and the required light gathering power of the reciever requires telescopes of 8 inch or larger diameter and photon counting.
I would like to use optics with a diameter of 3 inches maximum. I need a range of 1000 feet or more. A passive system using daylight would be preferable to an active system. I am aware that the polarization of light is changed by aerosols but my experiments in finding this effect (polaization filter and image processing) have not been successful. ANY other ideas about this topic are apreciated!
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Some aerosols are a lot more visible in the near infrared - and efficient IR lasers are less expensive.
I don't know if that leads to a solution, but it's what came to mind.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
.Scott is probably on to what you you need. If you have IR absorption/reradiation spectra for the chemical species in question you may want. The other issue is 'why?' You want to use reflected light. Transmitted light is also a viable answer. Then set up two stations - transmitter and receiver.

Would it not be simpler to use existing data sources - unless you want to examine a geographically limited point source? Perhaps if you explained what (NOT how you thought to do it) your goal is, then one of the well informed people on the forum probably already knows the answer. Give it a try.

Example maybe like this: 'I want to pinpoint emissions of XXX from location YYY with a home built system.'
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum
I was thinking of a balloon or drone lifting ether a retro reflector, or maybe a pulsed IR light source
on the far side of the target. The reflector would give you two passes through the gas,
but the single point source may cut down on the noise.
 
You know the air is there, why make it visible? Are you interested in CAT or aerosols?

Whatever technique you use will provide information from the whole path length. You need some way to focus on different distances.

A frequency swept lidar or radar system, (chirp), where the transmitted signal is used to down convert the received signal, will give you a plot of scatterer density against range for all selected points on the path.

You could fly a drone down the line, then back, sampling the aerosols on the way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
28K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K