Identical Hollow and Solid Spheres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an experiment to differentiate between a hollow sphere and a solid sphere of identical mass by analyzing their motion down an incline. The key equation used is mgh = ½ mv² + ½ I ω², with I defined as 2/3 mr² for the hollow sphere and 2/5 mr² for the solid sphere. Due to the solid sphere's smaller moment of inertia, it converts more gravitational potential energy into translational kinetic energy, resulting in a higher velocity at the bottom of the incline compared to the hollow sphere. The conclusion is that the solid sphere will reach the bottom faster due to its lower rotational energy and higher translational energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Familiarity with the moment of inertia for solid and hollow spheres
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Basic understanding of rotational motion and angular velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the relationship between rotational and translational motion
  • Explore experiments involving rolling objects on inclines
  • Investigate the effects of mass distribution on rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly in understanding the dynamics of rolling objects and energy conservation principles.

cassie123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two spheres look identical and have the same mass. However, one is hollow and the other is solid. Describe an experiment to determine which is which.

Homework Equations



mgh= ½ m v^2 + ½ I ω^2
where I= 2/3 mr2 for a hollow sphere
I=2/5 mr2 for a solid sphere

The Attempt at a Solution



You could allow the two spheres to roll an identical incline from rest. For both spheres, the gravitational potential energy will be transformed to both rotational kinetic energy and translational potential energy when they reach the base.

Since a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, it is less resistant to rotation. More of the original gravitational potential energy will be converted into rotational potential energy for the solid sphere than for the hollow sphere. Thus, the hollow sphere must have more translational kinetic energy and will reach the bottom at a greater translational velocity than the solid sphere will.

Logically I believe that the solid sphere should go faster.. so I am not confident in my logic above.

Could you also argue that the at the moment released from rest the solid sphere will begin to rotate to fall down the incline before the hollow sphere due to the differences in inertia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cassie123 said:
Since a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, it is less resistant to rotation. More of the original gravitational potential energy will be converted into rotational potential energy for the solid sphere than for the hollow sphere.
Think over this again.

If the solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, will its rotational energy be higher or lower than that of the hollow sphere, if they are rolling at the same rate?

Say sphere A will have a lower rotational energy than sphere B when rolling at the same rate, and both have the same mass. Given the same energy input to both, what can we then say about which one must be rolling faster?
 
andrewkirk said:
Think over this again.

If the solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia, will its rotational energy be higher or lower than that of the hollow sphere, if they are rolling at the same rate?

Say sphere A will have a lower rotational energy than sphere B when rolling at the same rate, and both have the same mass. Given the same energy input to both, what can we then say about which one must be rolling faster?
Based on the equation for the conservation of energy: if a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia it will then have a lower rotational energy than a hollow sphere. So, the solid sphere must have a higher translational energy and reach the bottom at a higher velocity.
Better?
 
cassie123 said:
Based on the equation for the conservation of energy: if a solid sphere has a smaller moment of inertia it will then have a lower rotational energy than a hollow sphere. So, the solid sphere must have a higher translational energy and reach the bottom at a higher velocity.
Better?
If the spheres have the same velocity then the one with the higher moment of inertia will have the higher rotational kinetic energy, right?

But they do not have the same velocity. The proposed experiment only works if their velocities are different. Instead, something else is being held constant.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
931
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K