Identifying local maximum, local minimum and saddle point.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying local maxima, minima, and saddle points in a given function plot. The initial assessments categorize Point P as a local maximum, Point Q as a local minimum, Point R as none, and Point S as a saddle point. Confusion arises regarding the contour lines, particularly around Point Q, where the presence of a +1 contour raises questions about the expected 0 contour's placement. Participants express concern that the plot may lack critical information, as the contours must connect appropriately for a continuous function. Overall, the clarity of the contour labels and their relationships is essential for accurate identification of the points.
BondKing
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Indicate whether you think it is a local maximum, local minimum, saddle point, or none of these?

615d6b88-0905-30da-8b9f-5d95379e82e4___38df22d3-72ff-3595-8d9b-53259de06ff3_zpsc9b9bd2b.png

My solution:

Point P = Local Max
Point Q = Local Min
Point R = None
Point S = Saddle

I got a 75% for first attempt, so one answer is not correct and I am not sure which one isn't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The circle around Q is confusing. If it is really +1, it should have a zero ring around it. If it is -1 (what I would expect), where is the minus sign?
Same problem with the circle to the right of R, just with reversed signs.

Either R or Q give the issue, which one depends on those sign problems.
 
mfb said:
The circle around Q is confusing. If it is really +1, it should have a zero ring around it. If it is -1 (what I would expect), where is the minus sign?
Same problem with the circle to the right of R, just with reversed signs.

Either R or Q give the issue, which one depends on those sign problems.

Actually the problem with Q is bigger than that. The 0 contour is marked in the picture: it is the pair of diagonal lines going through S. Given the 1 contour around Q, where should the 0 contour go? There must be one between -1 and 1 (unless the function is discontinuous on a ring around Q, in which case the problem is evil). But if the 0 contour is a ring around Q, then what to make of the 0 contour that is already drawn going through S? Either these contours must join up (possibly at R?), or there must be an additional local min/max somewhere between Q and the origin. Either way, it seems that important information has been omitted from the plot.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
The 0 contour is marked in the picture: it is the pair of diagonal lines going through S.
This cannot be the whole 0 contour for a continuous function. There is a path from a -1 to a +1 contour which has to have a 0 somewhere.
Ben Niehoff said:
But if the 0 contour is a ring around Q, then what to make of the 0 contour that is already drawn going through S?
Where is the problem? (x^2-y^2)^2*((x-1)^2+y^2-0.1) has this type of contours.
Ben Niehoff said:
or there must be an additional local min/max somewhere between Q and the origin.
It does not have to, but even if it has, where is the problem?
Ben Niehoff said:
Either way, it seems that important information has been omitted from the plot.
Certainly, as there is no 0 contour or the contour labels are wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K