If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ignition
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (K) when a mass is moved from Earth to space. It is established that as a mass is pulled up from Earth, its potential energy increases while its kinetic energy decreases. The participants clarify that gravitational potential energy is relative to a reference point, typically taken as zero at infinity, and that gravity remains a conservative field despite the changes in energy states. The conclusion emphasizes that potential energy does not become zero in space but approaches zero as the distance from Earth increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (K)
  • Familiarity with the concept of conservative fields in physics
  • Knowledge of reference points in energy calculations
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of gravitational potential energy in detail
  • Explore the concept of conservative forces in physics
  • Research the implications of energy conservation in gravitational systems
  • Learn about reference points in potential energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of energy conservation and gravitational forces.

Ignition
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K decreases, but if it became pulled into space, its U becames 0. So, could we say that Gravity is not a conservative field in large scale, but a negative Energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignition said:
If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K decreases, but if it became pulled into space, its U becames 0.
Realize, since we take U = 0 at infinity as the reference point, that the U of the system starts out negative and increases to zero.
So, could we say that Gravity is not a conservative field in large scale, but a negative Energy?
Not sure why you'd conclude that gravity is not conservative at large scale. Realize that the sign of potential energy depends on your reference point.
 
Ignition said:
If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K decreases
Well, no. If it is pulled into space, then there is a force acting on it which would increase its total energy. It might well keep the same K (Kinetic energy) while increasing its potential energy. If it already has a large kinetic energy on Earth and uses only that energy to move away from the earth, with no external force, then the kinetic energy decreases while the potential energy increases so the total energy remains the same.

, but if it became pulled into space, its U becames 0.So, could we say that Gravity is not a conservative field in large scale, but a negative Energy?
Again, no. Its potential energy does NOT become 0 "in space". For gravitational problems, potential energy (which, as Doc Al said, is always relative to some reference point) is taken to be 0 at infinity, not just in space. If you take an object to have a very large negative potential energy on Earth (and considering only the Earth's gravity) the at several light years from the Earth it would have a very small, but still non-zero negative, potential energy.
 
Ok, great, you are very good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
824
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
977
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K