If we can move at the speed of light, can we pass a small hole?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of moving at the speed of light and whether it would allow an object to pass through a small hole, such as a keyhole. Participants explore concepts related to special relativity, including length contraction and the implications of mass and energy at relativistic speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that moving at the speed of light is not possible for objects with mass, citing the increase in relativistic mass and the energy required to approach light speed.
  • Length contraction is discussed, with some suggesting that while an object may appear skinnier in the direction of motion, it would not reduce in transverse dimensions, thus not allowing it to fit through a small hole.
  • One participant proposes a thought experiment involving a photon, electron, and proton, discussing how their collision cross sections change with energy, which may relate to the original question about passing through a hole.
  • Confusion arises regarding the original question, with some participants seeking clarification on what is meant by passing through a small hole and whether it relates to visual perception of distant stars.
  • Several participants express skepticism about the validity of the assumptions underlying the question, suggesting that it leads to nonsensical conclusions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the original question, with multiple competing views and interpretations of the concepts involved. Participants express differing opinions on the feasibility of the scenario and the implications of relativistic effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion hinges on assumptions about the nature of mass and the applicability of relativistic physics, which may not be universally accepted or understood. The conversation also reveals a lack of clarity regarding the original intent of the question posed by the OP.

beste ulusoy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If we can motion at speed of light,can we pass a small hole like a keyhole? Of course in suitable conditions...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed of light is only achievable by massless particles. It would be fascinating to see what a massless particle sees, but, we haven't figured out how to mount a massless camera on one to observe what happens.
 
beste ulusoy said:
If we can motion at speed of light,can we pass a small hole like a keyhole? Of course in suitable conditions...

The short answer is no.

So you probably know that moving at the speed of light is not considered possible (for something with mass). This is related to the fact that as you get faster your mass increases, which makes it harder to go even faster (requires more energy) until it will actually require an infinite amount of energy to increase your speed even more.

However, let's pretend we are really close to the speed of light. In this case there is something called length contraction which will make an object very skinny in the direction that it is moving when observed by someone who is watching it pass by at that really fast speed (close to the speed of light). The object will get skinnier but it will not get shorter (or less wide) so it will not fit through through the key hole. By the way in this case

---------> If this is the direction the object is moving in
-------------> this is the dimension of the object that is "skinny"

if an object looked like this (and was moving right very fast) :
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------

it could start to look like this (at high enough speeds):

------
------
------I should tell you that I have not taken unusually advanced physics yet. It is possible outside of normal special relativity that there is a theory somewhere that suggests otherwise, but I am 99% confident in my answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: harrylin
i just ask my question out of all rules.this is just a think.if we can move at speed of light(assume),can we pass a little hole
for example how to fit these huge stars to our eyes,how can we see them
 
beste ulusoy said:
i just ask my question out of all rules.this is just a think.if we can move at speed of light(assume),can we pass a little hole
for example how to fit these huge stars to our eyes,how can we see them

I cannot understand you. Are you asking how we can see stars?
Are you asking if we can fit large objects through small holes while traveling at near-light speed?
 
beste ulusoy said:
... if we can move at speed of light(assume) ...
It is unacceptable to assume we can move at the speed of light.

Your question is like asking "if the laws of physics do not apply, what do the laws of physics say about <insert nonsense of your choice>"
 
beste ulusoy said:
If we can motion at speed of light,can we pass a small hole like a keyhole? Of course in suitable conditions...

This is a typical "When did you stop beating your wife?" question.

Secondly, even with applying length contraction, the contraction is only along the direction of motion, not in the transverse direction! Your transverse size is still the SAME!

Zz.
 
Essence said:
So you probably know that moving at the speed of light is not considered possible (for something with mass). This is related to the fact that as you get faster your mass increases, which makes it harder to go even faster (requires more energy) until it will actually require an infinite amount of energy to increase your speed even more.

The truth of this sentence is conditioned on "mass" meaning "relativistic mass", a concept most physicists tend to avoid. For the reasons why, see our FAQ on the subject: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-relativistic-mass-and-why-it-is-not-used-much.796527/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm still trying to figure out what he means by "can we pass a small hole like a keyhole".
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
I'm still trying to figure out what he means by "can we pass a small hole like a keyhole".
I think he's totally confused about length contraction and thinks that things set skinnier along their line of travel and if they get skinny enough they could pass through a keyhole.
 
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
I'm still trying to figure out what he means by "can we pass a small hole like a keyhole".
You can pass almost everything if you move fast enough... and don't care about surviving it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD
  • #12
Perhaps we should wait and see what the OP says instead of trying to guess.
 
  • #13
phinds said:
I think he's totally confused about length contraction and thinks that things set skinnier along their line of travel and if they get skinny enough they could pass through a keyhole.
Ohhhh. Pass through the keyhole.
Because of length contraction.

OK, I get what he's asking now.
 
  • #14
Drakkith said:
Perhaps we should wait and see what the OP says instead of trying to guess.
Yeah, but guessing is so much more fun ... and apparently none of us have anything better to do anyway :smile:
 
  • #15
"pass a small hole like a keyhole"

I think this means pass through a slot... the OP may be confused about the dimension of contraction, unless he is thinking of something like this:

The object's path has two components, vertical Y and horizontal X, so the observed contraction may be in the X dimension, but that contraction allows the object to slip in the Y direction though a slot with its long axis oriented in the Z dimension, so as to accept passage of the X contracted object "sideways" ...

Kind of like throwing a loaf of bread fast enough that it contracts to the thickness of a single slice, and then that slice takes on a vertical component to fall into the slot of an awaiting toaster oriented sideways...

But yeah, let's see if the OP can clarify...
 
  • #16
I think the OP's a drive-by and we're just flailing around :smile:
 
  • #17
phinds said:
I think the OP's a drive-by and we're just flailing around :smile:
It's only been 18 hours...
 
  • #18
DaveC426913 said:
It's only been 18 hours...
Yeah, but patience is not one of my virtues :smile:
 
  • #19
phinds said:
and apparently none of us have anything better to do anyway
Well, you could edit your typo... :oldwink:... :oldbiggrin:
...thinks that things set skinnier along their line of travel...
 
  • #20
OCR said:
Well, you could edit your typo... :oldwink:... :oldbiggrin:
an innocent slip of the figner :smile:
 
  • #21
phinds said:
an innocent slip of the figner :smile:

Understood...
 
  • #22
Just for fun, let's try to put a photon, an electron and a proton through that small hole.

The photon does not get any faster, but as it gets more energetic, it gets “skinnier” sideways (transversely) as well as longitudinally.

If I understand what I have read correctly, the electron-electron collision cross section also shrinks with increasing energy.

The proton-proton collision cross section, on the other hand increases with increasing energy.

(For nice pictures, google electron electron cross section images and also proton proton cross section images.)

Comments or corrections?

Thanks.

Jim Graber
 
  • #23
jimgraber said:
Comments or corrections?

Thanks.
do you understand me? and do you agree with me partially?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
what's the reason of a big object can not go through in a small hole? i guess, it is the distance between them and the elapsed time. because when the object is far away, it is as small as can go through in a small hole. but as long as the object approach the hole, namely, as long as it passes the road and the time, the possibility of the object's ability to go through in the hole gets low. if this object moves as fast as speed of light the distance between the hole and the object disappears instantly. so can the object go through in the hole?
 
  • #25
beste ulusoy said:
how to fit these huge stars to our eyes,how can we see them
beste ulusoy said:
when the object is far away, it is as small as can go through in a small hole
This is a truly bizarre comment. Do you actually believe that a star can go through a hole the size of your pupil because it is far away and therefore small enough? I must be really misunderstanding you, because this is the type of geometrical idea that even a very young child knows is wrong.

beste ulusoy said:
if this object moves as fast as speed of light the distance between the hole and the object disappears instantly. so can the object go through in the hole?
No.
 
  • #26
If… If you assume something that's impossible, you can conclude anything. So yes, if massive objects can move the speed of light, they can also pass through small holes.
 
  • #27
Wim Nobel said:
If… If you assume something that's impossible, you can conclude anything. So yes, if massive objects can move the speed of light, they can also pass through small holes.
Let's not mislead the OP here. The latter does not follow from the former.

If one supposed a massive object to go the speed of light, it does not follow that it can pass through a small hole. (I don't think you were implying that it does; I just wanted to state it for the OP's edification.)

You could suppose multiple, independent impossibilities, such as:
- massive objects can move at c, and/or
- large objects can fit through tiny holes, and/or
- they turn into unicorns.

They are all equally - and independently - impossible.

(OK, #2 is an exception. A large object could fit through a tiny hole if it were very thin and very long.)
 
  • #28
On that good note, thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K