If xn = yn + zn, and xn, yn, zn >0, and xn xonverges, then yn converges.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aerostd
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the convergence of the sequence \( y_n \) given that \( x_n = y_n + z_n \) converges and all sequences \( x_n, y_n, z_n > 0 \). The Cauchy criterion is proposed as a method for the proof, utilizing the condition that for any \( \epsilon > 0 \), there exists an \( N \) such that for all \( n, m > N \), the inequality \( |x_n - x_m| < \epsilon \) holds. The challenge arises in applying the triangle inequality due to uncertainty about the behavior of \( z_n \), leading to concerns about potential counterexamples.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and convergence in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy criterion for convergence
  • Knowledge of triangle inequality and its applications
  • Basic concepts of counterexamples in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy criterion in depth to understand its application in proving convergence
  • Explore examples of sequences that converge and their properties
  • Investigate the implications of adding sequences and how it affects convergence
  • Learn about constructing counterexamples in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of real analysis, mathematicians interested in sequence convergence, and educators looking for examples of convergence proofs and counterexamples.

Aerostd
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let x_{n} = y_{n} + z_{n}
Also, x_{n}&gt;0, y_{n}&gt;0, z_{n}&gt;0. We also know that x_{n} converges.

Prove that y_{n} converges.


Homework Equations



I want to use the Cauchy criterion because the limits are not given. So start with an \epsilon &gt;0 [/itex]. Then there exists N such that for all n, m &amp;gt; N[/itex], &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; | x_{n} - x_{m} | &amp;amp;lt; \epsilon [/itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;h2&amp;gt;The Attempt at a Solution&amp;lt;/h2&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Well, substituting the expression for x_{n},&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt; | y_{n} + z_{n} - y_{m} - z_{m} | = | y_{n} - y_{m} + z_{n} - z_{m} |&amp;amp;lt;br /&amp;amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Here, I can&amp;amp;#039;t use the triangle inequality because it goes in the wrong direction. Basically I don&amp;amp;#039;t know if z_{n} - z_{m} is greater than zero or less than zero which is causing problems. Is there another method which I can use to prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you know nothing about z_n??

I think it's very easy to find a counterexample to this.
 
micromass said:
So you know nothing about z_n??

I think it's very easy to find a counterexample to this.

Actually I just thought of one. Thanks.

:confused: as always.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K