IF you could travel faster than light, would time cease or

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of traveling faster than light (FTL) and its effects on time, as well as the conceptual validity of such scenarios within the framework of special relativity. Participants explore theoretical perspectives and interpretations related to FTL travel and time perception.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant relays their professor's assertion that traveling faster than light would render time non-existent, equating it to a nonsensical task.
  • Another participant agrees, stating that the question of FTL travel violates the fundamental principles of special relativity, making it nonsensical to ask what predictions the theory would make under such conditions.
  • A third participant reflects on the idea that from an outside perspective, one might appear to be time traveling if they could travel faster than light, but expresses confusion about how time would be perceived by the traveler themselves.
  • A limerick is shared that humorously illustrates the concept of traveling faster than light and its implications on time.
  • One participant mentions quantum tunneling, suggesting it as a related concept, while another counters that it is not relevant to the current topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the question of FTL travel poses conceptual challenges within the framework of special relativity, but there are differing interpretations regarding the implications of such travel on time and the validity of the questions posed.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of time and the framework of special relativity are not fully explored, and the discussion includes references to concepts that may not directly relate to the main topic, such as quantum tunneling.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring theoretical physics, particularly concepts related to relativity, time, and the implications of faster-than-light travel.

Tap Banister
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
Greetings everyone, I asked my professor about this, recently. I had always heard that if you could gain the impossible amount of energy necessary to run beyond the speed of light, you would travel backwards in time. But he however, told me something that I have never heard before.

He said, "If you were simply breaking the laws of nature to run that fast with just the speed produced by that energy, time would no longer exist; because going faster than light, in that way, is the same as accomplishing a nonsense task like drawing a squarclelangle. At those speeds, there is no such thing as time, you would be a being beyond time."

He did note that FTL was not necessarily impossible, but doing it in that way wasn't even a thing that made sense. It was like asking a question in a made up language. He is an incredible-awesome professor, but is he right about this? Your answers would be greatly cherished.

 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, he is right. The question is a nonsense question within special relativity. It is like asking for what you should do when the traffic light shows blue (well, if you take SR into account you should probably slow down, but this is not the point here). It is a question which breaks the fundamental principles of the theory. Asking what a theory predicts when its fundamental assumptions are violated is just nonsensical.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD and Tap Banister
Thank you for the clarification.

A friend had also told me that it would lead to me looking like I'm time traveling from a bystander's perspective, which kind of to made sense to me, but when I thought about how time would appear to me in the act; that's when it started making less sense.

I appreciate your knowledge
 
This thread reminded me of the following limerick.

There was a young lady named Bright,
Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day,
In a relative way,
And returned home the previous night.

A. H. Reginald Buller,
Emeritus Professor of Botany, University of Manitoba.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tap Banister
Well there is quantum tunnelling...
 
houlahound said:
Well there is quantum tunnelling...
Which has essentially nothing to do with this topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K