I'm curious about radiation effect from high speed cpu

AI Thread Summary
High-speed CPUs operating at GHz and aiming for THz speeds raise concerns about radiation effects, particularly as electrical frequency increases. While energy loss due to radiation is minimal, it can interfere with radio communications, prompting regulatory measures to control electromagnetic interference (EMI). Engineers mitigate these effects through grounding, shielding, and filtering, adhering to standards like FCC Part 15 in the US and the EMC Directive in Europe. Studies indicate that low-level non-ionizing radiation from devices poses no significant harm to humans, with most health concerns linked to lifestyle choices rather than radiation exposure. Overall, the industry actively manages these challenges to ensure compliance and minimize interference.
goodphy
Messages
212
Reaction score
8
Hello.

We're in the age of the high speed computation. Personal computer clock speed is on the order of GHz and scientist looks for a way to raise the speed up to THz class.

I've read this from newspaper and got some question. I've learned in class that radiation effect becomes severe as electrical frequency becomes higher and higher on the conductor. Although I have no calculation of how much energy is lost to radiation, I guess this kind of loss is observable and maybe huge. Maybe industry already faces this side effect.

How is this effect controlled or minimized? Engineers should consider this effect..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Lowering voltages reduces the effect.
 
  • Like
Likes goodphy
Don't believe everything you read. You get a greatly larger dose of radiation every time you go outdoors in sunshine.

Never forget that energy is conserved. To produce a "huge" amount of radiation energy, you need to put a "huge" amount of electric power in.
 
  • Like
Likes goodphy
Various government agencies regulate the permissible EMI (which is the radiation you speak of) from electrical/electronic devices. Is is required to minimize interference to RF receiving devices nearby.

Every designer of commercial products must consider spurious emissions (Electromagnetic interference or EMI) and get product certification that they meet standards.
(It's a royal pain, BTW)

Emissions are reduced by proper grounding, shielding, filtering (edge rate control) and use of transmission lines (controlled impedance traces) in PCB's.

In the US, the emissions are controlled by FCC Part 15. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_CFR_Part_15

I think wifi, cell phones, emit more than typical computers.
 
  • Like
Likes Jeff Rosenbury, donpacino, davenn and 1 other person
goodphy said:
Hello.

We're in the age of the high speed computation. Personal computer clock speed is on the order of GHz and scientist looks for a way to raise the speed up to THz class.

I've read this from newspaper and got some question. I've learned in class that radiation effect becomes severe as electrical frequency becomes higher and higher on the conductor. Although I have no calculation of how much energy is lost to radiation, I guess this kind of loss is observable and maybe huge. Maybe industry already faces this side effect.

How is this effect controlled or minimized? Engineers should consider this effect..
I think the main problem is not the loss of energy, which is very small, but problems caused to radio communication users (mobile phone, Wi-Fi, TV, PMR etc). They do not like their noise floor being raised by something that is not intended to radiate. Radio spectrum is now a commodity with high value. In a similar way to the FCC, Europe also has regulations in place under the EMC Directive 2004/108/EC.
 
  • Like
Likes goodphy
If you are concerned about the danger to humans caused by low level non-ionizing radiation, it has been studied extensively.

Most studies show no harm from the radiation, but there is a correlation with the equipment. Most of this seems to be due to lifestyle choices. (Couch potatohood)
 
  • Like
Likes goodphy
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top