I'm having trouble understanding the following sentence from Schutz's

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter schwarzschild
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the interpretation of tensor notation in Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity," specifically the distinction between components of one-forms and vectors. The notation p_a represents a one-form, while an upper index denotes a vector component. The user illustrates this with a vector X expressed in component form, demonstrating how it interacts with the dual basis to yield the components of X through the delta function. The conversation emphasizes the transformation properties of covariant and contravariant components in tensor analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and indices in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with the concepts of dual bases and their properties
  • Knowledge of covariant and contravariant transformations
  • Basic grasp of the delta function in mathematical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of dual bases in linear algebra
  • Learn about covariant and contravariant tensors in detail
  • Explore the application of the delta function in tensor calculus
  • Review Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity" for further examples and explanations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying general relativity, as well as mathematicians interested in tensor analysis and differential geometry.

schwarzschild
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I'm having trouble understanding the following sentence from Schutz's A First Course in General Relativity, so I was hoping someone could explain/expound on it. "
[tex]p_a \equiv \widetilde{p}( \vec{e_{\alpha} ) } )[/tex] Any component with a single lower index is, by convention, the component of a one-form; an upper index denotes the component of a vector."
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If I have a vector X, I can write it in component form as

[tex] X = X^{\mu}e_{(\mu)}[/tex]

I put round brackets around the mu index of the basis vector e to indicate that for every mu we have a whole vector, not just one component! Now, I can act with this vector X on the dual basis:

[tex] X(e^{(\nu)}) = X^{\mu} e_{(\mu)} (e^{(\nu)}) = X^{\mu}\delta_{\mu}^{\nu} = X^{\nu}[/tex]
In words: acting with the vector X on the dual basis means acting with the basis on the dual basis, times the components of X. By definition this gives me a delta function times the components of X, which equals the components of X. This holds for every tensor T in general; you could try it for, say, a rank (2,1) tensor T.

Components with lower indices transform different from components with upper indices; the latter we sometimes call "contravariant", the former "covariant" ( co goes below ).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K