I'm not sure if I understand the question - please clarify!

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming the variable of integration in the hypergeometric function _2F_1(a,b;c;z) from t to t-1. The user attempts various methods, including direct substitution and U substitution, but encounters difficulties with analytically solving the resulting integrals. The conversation highlights the importance of the z term in the denominator, which affects the transformation's validity and the function's dependency on z. Ultimately, the transformation leads to a new expression involving the hypergeometric function with adjusted parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hypergeometric functions, specifically _2F_1(a,b;c;z)
  • Knowledge of variable substitution techniques in calculus
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and analytical solutions
  • Basic comprehension of mathematical notation and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study hypergeometric function transformations in detail
  • Learn about U substitution in integral calculus
  • Explore the properties and applications of _2F_1(a,b;c;z)
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving integrals that cannot be solved analytically
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus, researchers working with hypergeometric functions, and anyone interested in integral transformations.

Wishbone
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with a problem that asks me to show that if I change the variable of integration of the following equation from t to t-1 the following

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/EulersHypergeometricTransformations/equation1.gif
(disregard that z in the denominator, that should not be there)

will equal the following

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/EulersHypergeometricTransformations/inline16.gif
(this one uses z's instead of t's)I have tried simply changing the all the t's to t-1, and the only differentiating the t-1 term. That of course didn't work. I also tried a U substitution and that gave me an integral that looked like it couldn't be solved analytically (if you want me to post that code I can). I am not sure whether I even need to integrate, or whether this is one of those problems with a really quick shortuct and I can avoid doing any integration. Anyways, any help would be appreicated, thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
(disregard that z in the denominator, that should not be there)
Why do you think it should not be there? Without it, the right side does not depend on z at all, although the left side being 2F1(a,b;c;z) suggests it should.
 
a Hypergeometric transformation

[tex]_2F_1(a,b;c;z)=\int_{t=0}^{1}\frac{t^{b-1}(1-t)^{c-b-1}}{(1-tz)^{a}}dt[/tex]

now substitute t=1-u which gives dt=-du to get

[tex]_2F_1(a,b;c;z) = -\int_{u=1}^{0}\frac{(1-u)^{b-1}u^{c-b-1}}{(1-z+uz)^{a}}du = \int_{u=0}^{1}\frac{u^{c-b-1}(1-u)^{b-1}}{(1-z)^a\left( 1+u\frac{z}{1-z}}\right) ^{a}}du[/tex]
[tex]= (1-z)^{-a} \int_{u=0}^{1}\frac{u^{c-b-1}(1-u)^{b-1}}{\left( 1+u\frac{z}{1-z}}\right) ^{a}}du = (1-z)^{-a} \, _2F_1 \left( a,c-b;c ;\frac{z}{z-1}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K