I'm really confused about Winding Numbers in Complex Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of winding numbers in complex analysis, specifically determining the winding number around the point -i (0, -1) on a given curve. Participants concluded that the winding number is 2, as the two upper loops do not encircle the point -i and can be disregarded. The importance of curve orientation and the method of counting counterclockwise (CCW) and clockwise (CW) crossings to determine the winding number were emphasized. A practical technique was shared, involving drawing a line from the point of interest to count crossings, which solidifies the understanding of winding numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, particularly winding numbers.
  • Familiarity with curve parametrization and integration in complex functions.
  • Knowledge of counterclockwise (CCW) and clockwise (CW) orientations.
  • Basic skills in visualizing curves and their intersections in the complex plane.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of calculating winding numbers using line integrals in complex analysis.
  • Learn about curve parametrization techniques for complex functions.
  • Research the implications of curve orientation on winding numbers.
  • Explore examples of winding number calculations in different complex curves.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concept of winding numbers for their students.

~Death~
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was hoping someone could help me understanding winding numbers

For e.g. the point -i that is (0,-1) on this curve...

I was trying to determine if the winding number was 2 or 3

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1668/11111111111111countour.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ~Death~! :smile:

It's 2 …

the two upper loops don't go round -i, so you can flatten them out (alternatively, just "snip them off") without changing the winding number …

what's left obviously winds twice (in the same direction) :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi ~Death~! :smile:

It's 2 …

the two upper loops don't go round -i, so you can flatten them out (alternatively, just "snip them off") without changing the winding number …

what's left obviously winds twice (in the same direction) :wink:

thanks

im still kind of confused though because, why don't I count these loops?

it looks to me like there's an extra one
 

Attachments

  • 11111111111111countour.JPG
    11111111111111countour.JPG
    30.1 KB · Views: 484
I think for a general answer to the question, you need to know the orientation of the curves. The winding numbers may cancel each other out if the two curves that wind around the point wind in opposite directions.

OWise, like Tiny Tim said, you just need to look at curve segments that form loops that
wind around (0,1). How many do you see.?

Even more precisely, if you knew the parametrization of the curve, you could integrate
around it to find the winding number.
 
~Death~ said:
thanks

im still kind of confused though because, why don't I count these loops?

it looks to me like there's an extra one

The way you've drawn it, there is!

If you start at the origin, go round the blue circle, then go round the green circle, then go round the red circle, and do some of the curve twice, that path has a winding number of 3 (or of 1, if you go round one of the circles the "wrong way"). :smile:

But the original diagram is presumably intended to indicate that one follows the curve in the only possible smooth way, and each section once only, giving 2. :wink:
 
An old EE prof showed us a trick on how to easily determine winding numbers: start from the point you care about (-i) and draw a straight line out from that in any direction. Count the number of CCW "crossings" of that line, and subtract the CW "crossings". That is your winding number. In this case, assuming the curve is smooth, it is either 2 or -2. Orientation matters!

jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K