Image by Refraction through Flat Surface

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a fish watcher observing a fish through a glass tank, with specific indices of refraction for glass and water. The calculated distance at which the watcher appears to the fish is 20.0 cm, achieved by using small angles in Snell's law. It is noted that Snell's law remains accurate for all angles, but larger angles may cause the image to blur. The conversation highlights that only rays with small angles of incidence effectively reach the fish's eye when the watcher is small and close to the normal line. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the relationship between angle size and image clarity in refraction scenarios.
Tom MS
Messages
27
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A fish watcher at point P watches a fish through a glass wall of a fish tank. The watcher is level with the fish; the index of refraction of the glass is 8/5, and that of the water is 4/3. The distances are d1=8.0 cm, d2=3.0 cm, and d3=6.8 cm (a) To the fish, how far away does the watcher appear to be?
media%2F207%2F207d6e1c-e358-4fac-abf2-15f8b8825e51%2FphpQ3F6rI.png

Homework Equations


n1*sin(θ1) = n2*sin(θ2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the correct answer of 20.0 cm, but only when I used very small angles to form the image. I basically chose an arbitrary angle of light coming from the watcher and, using trig, calculated the final angle of refraction from the glass-water interface. I then traced it backwards to the central axis.

As the "arbitrary initial angle approached 0°, the image distance from the fish got closer to 20.0 cm. This would seem to indicate snell's law becomes more accurate with small angles or that the image is smeared out. I couldn't find anything about this when I looked it up. Could someone explain this to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom MS said:
I basically chose an arbitrary angle of light coming from the watcher and, using trig, calculated the final angle of refraction from the glass-water interface. I then traced it backwards to the central axis.

As the "arbitrary initial angle approached 0°, the image distance from the fish got closer to 20.0 cm. .
Sounds good.

This would seem to indicate snell's law becomes more accurate with small angles or that the image is smeared out.
Snells law is accurate for all angles. But, you are right that the image would become blurred if the fish's eye could pick up rays for larger angles. For the case where the size of the watcher is small and the fish is very close to the normal line from the watcher, you can see that the only rays that reach the eye of the fish are rays with small angles of incidence.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K