Image by Refraction through Flat Surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the refraction of light as observed by a fish watcher through a glass wall of a fish tank. The index of refraction for glass is 8/5, while that for water is 4/3. The calculated distance at which the watcher appears to the fish is 20.0 cm, determined using Snell's Law and small angle approximations. The conversation highlights that Snell's Law remains accurate across all angles, but the image becomes blurred for larger angles due to the limitations of the fish's vision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law (n1*sin(θ1) = n2*sin(θ2))
  • Knowledge of the concept of refraction and indices of refraction
  • Familiarity with basic trigonometry and angle calculations
  • Concept of image formation in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Snell's Law in various optical media
  • Explore the effects of angle of incidence on image clarity in optics
  • Investigate the relationship between the size of objects and their perceived distance in refraction scenarios
  • Learn about advanced optical phenomena such as aberration and distortion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light refraction and image formation in aquatic environments.

Tom MS
Messages
27
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A fish watcher at point P watches a fish through a glass wall of a fish tank. The watcher is level with the fish; the index of refraction of the glass is 8/5, and that of the water is 4/3. The distances are d1=8.0 cm, d2=3.0 cm, and d3=6.8 cm (a) To the fish, how far away does the watcher appear to be?
media%2F207%2F207d6e1c-e358-4fac-abf2-15f8b8825e51%2FphpQ3F6rI.png

Homework Equations


n1*sin(θ1) = n2*sin(θ2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the correct answer of 20.0 cm, but only when I used very small angles to form the image. I basically chose an arbitrary angle of light coming from the watcher and, using trig, calculated the final angle of refraction from the glass-water interface. I then traced it backwards to the central axis.

As the "arbitrary initial angle approached 0°, the image distance from the fish got closer to 20.0 cm. This would seem to indicate snell's law becomes more accurate with small angles or that the image is smeared out. I couldn't find anything about this when I looked it up. Could someone explain this to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom MS said:
I basically chose an arbitrary angle of light coming from the watcher and, using trig, calculated the final angle of refraction from the glass-water interface. I then traced it backwards to the central axis.

As the "arbitrary initial angle approached 0°, the image distance from the fish got closer to 20.0 cm. .
Sounds good.

This would seem to indicate snell's law becomes more accurate with small angles or that the image is smeared out.
Snells law is accurate for all angles. But, you are right that the image would become blurred if the fish's eye could pick up rays for larger angles. For the case where the size of the watcher is small and the fish is very close to the normal line from the watcher, you can see that the only rays that reach the eye of the fish are rays with small angles of incidence.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K