Image Method for B-Field Calculation on Iron Plate

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the B-field of a conductor above an iron plate using the complex image method. It is established that for perfect conductivity, reflecting the current at the surface suffices, while for non-perfect conductivity, the image current must be adjusted by twice the complex skin depth. The user notes that while the image method works well for ferrite, it poses challenges for iron due to its hysteresis loop and non-linear material properties. Comparisons with Comsol simulations indicate that linear approximations can yield satisfactory results in specific scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex image method for electromagnetic calculations
  • Understanding of skin depth in conductive materials
  • Knowledge of hysteresis loops in magnetic materials
  • Familiarity with Comsol Multiphysics for simulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the complex image method in non-linear materials
  • Explore advanced modeling techniques in Comsol for magnetic fields
  • Study the effects of hysteresis in iron on electromagnetic calculations
  • Investigate the impact of varying permeability (µr) in B-field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in electromagnetic field calculations, particularly those working with conductive materials and simulations in Comsol.

glj6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am wondering if it is possible to calculate the B-field of a conductor above an iron plate just using the complex image method. To keep it simple let’s consider a 2D calculation, the metal plate is infinitely deep and wide and the conductor is infinitely long and thin. If the metal plate has perfect conductivity, then it is sufficient to reflect the current only at the surface of the metal plate. If µr = 1 and the conductivity is not perfect, then the image current must be shifted by twice the distance of the complex skin depth. The approach gives very good results in comparison with Comsol results.

Now I ask myself how can a µr > 1 still be introduced there? A ferrite, on the other hand, can be calculated without problems using the image method, but the mixed form, e.g. iron, is problematic.
I hope someone can help me, at least with a source where someone has done something like this. Or someone can explain to me why such a calculation is not possible.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem with any magnetic calculation involving iron is it’s hysteresis loop. For very weak currents/fields, the response is approximately linear, but in general the material properties are non-linear and involve memory effects so computer codes are the way to go.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
marcusl said:
The problem with any magnetic calculation involving iron is it’s hysteresis loop. For very weak currents/fields, the response is approximately linear, but in general the material properties are non-linear and involve memory effects so computer codes are the way to go.
Thank you very much for your answer. The hysteresis loop is only a problem near saturation, I would consider a linear behavior in my calculation. The same is true for my Comsol model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K