Impact force of Rigid objects and no displacement

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of impact force when rigid objects collide without noticeable deformation or rebound. Participants explore the relationship between kinetic energy, force, and the mechanics of collisions, particularly in scenarios involving projectiles and rigid targets. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and practical implications of these interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how to calculate impact force when kinetic energy (KE) does not result in displacement or rebound, as seen in the examples of a box dropped on a desk and a hammer hitting a wall.
  • There is a suggestion to use the concepts of momentum change and impulse to analyze the situation, although the specifics of impact time and material absorption are raised as uncertainties.
  • One participant proposes a hypothetical scenario where a bullet with a specific amount of kinetic energy could exert a force on a target without penetrating it, leading to a displacement of the target.
  • Another participant challenges the notion that kinetic energy can be directly converted into force, emphasizing that KE and force are distinct concepts and that KE is not conserved in collisions.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of calculations presented, particularly regarding conservation of momentum and the appropriateness of using kinetic energy in the context of impact force.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of Newton's third law in the context of forces exerted during collisions, with some participants asserting that the force exerted by a bullet on a target is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the force experienced by the bullet.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between kinetic energy and impact force, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to calculating impact force in the scenarios described.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their discussions, including the dependence on assumptions about material properties, the duration of impact, and the complexities of energy transformation during collisions. There are also references to unresolved mathematical steps and the need for clarity in definitions.

  • #61
Drakkith said:
This isn't possible and therefore the rest of your post isn't applicable.

that is not true, its abides by the laws of energy but it hasn't been done, no object has proven tough enough to withstand that force...now the material is possible...
However, my post relates to hammer and nail, that is KE doing work, this is a staple fact of the laws of physics...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
This is nonsense. Myself and others have explained to you multiple times why your scenarios can't work. Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K