MHB Implementing f(w1,w2,w3) Using 3-to-8 Binary Decoder & OR Gate

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Show how the function f(w1,w2,w3,) = Ʃm(0,1,2,4,7) can be implemented using a 3-to-8 binary decoder and an OR gate (hint: look at MUX built using a decoder and figure out how to remove the and gates.

Um. Yea. Help.(Speechless)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you've got beyond my personal knowledge of circuits. If there is somebody more knowledgeable on this forum, fine. Otherwise, I am afraid I can't help you with definitions. If you want help, you'll have to provide definitions of new concepts (in this case: binary decoder and MUX) and briefly explain what kind of beast they are. Then I can only help with common mathematical sense.
 
Ok I will see what I can do.
 
so I figured out how to get the function or the output. But Now I don't know hwo they are getting the outupt

- - - Updated - - -

how would i minimize w!w3! + w2w3! + w1!w2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top