Improper Integral Solution Check: Is Your Answer Accurate?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating an improper integral, specifically ∫(2 to ∞) dv/(v^2 + 2v - 3). The original poster seeks validation of their computed answer and methods for self-verification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of partial fractions and substitutions, such as u = v + 1, to simplify the integral. There is also mention of completing the square and its relevance to the integration process.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods of integration and checking the validity of the original poster's answer. Some guidance has been offered regarding substitution and transformation of the integral.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring the accuracy of the integral evaluation, and participants are questioning the assumptions made in the original setup and the methods used for integration.

B18
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Hi guys just want to check my answer for the following improper integral.

∫(2 to ∞) dv/v^2+2v-3.

After doing partial fractions, integrating and evaluating I got the following for the answer: 0-(1/4)ln(1/5)

How does this compare to other answers?

Is there a way I can accurately check this answer myself?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if I'm not mistaken u= (v+1) is pretty easy and it ends up fitting the arctanh rule. Seems that it'll involve an inverse hyperbolic function
 
Last edited:
What exactly do you mean that substituting u=v+1 is easy? I don't see any substitution in this problem
 
B18 said:
What exactly do you mean that substituting u=v+1 is easy? I don't see any substitution in this problem

I meant completing the square so that the denominator is (v+1)^2 -4. Multiply by -1/-1 and you have -dv/(4-(v+1)^2)
which fits the rule ∫du/(a^2-u^2)=1/2a(ln (a+u/a-u)+c
 
Last edited:
Alright, that would make sense. Hopefully people get a similar final answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K