Improving MPG with hydrogen/oxygen

  • Thread starter Thread starter Razzor7
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Using an alternator to hydrolyze water into hydrogen and oxygen for engine use raises questions about improving gas mileage. The process appears to involve energy loss, as the energy required to hydrolyze water is greater than the energy gained from burning the resulting gases. Some suggest that hydrogen may enhance gasoline combustion efficiency, potentially leading to better fuel economy. However, the consensus is that the actual benefit may be minimal or negligible. Overall, the effectiveness of such systems remains highly debated, with skepticism about their true impact on MPG.
Razzor7
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
If you use the alternator to hydrolysis water and then run the oxygen/hydrogen into the engine, is there any way for this to improve your gas mileage? I know that many such devices exist, but on the surface it appears that energy must be lost. Energy from the gasoline is hydrolyzing the water, and then energy is regained from these byproducts of hydrolysis. But this amount of energy must be less than the original input. The only alternate I can imagine is that a combination of hydrogen and gasoline in the engine causes the gasoline to burn more effectively, creating a net MPG benefit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Razzor7 said:
If you use the alternator to hydrolysis water and then run the oxygen/hydrogen into the engine, is there any way for this to improve your gas mileage? I know that many such devices exist, but on the surface it appears that energy must be lost. Energy from the gasoline is hydrolyzing the water, and then energy is regained from these byproducts of hydrolysis. But this amount of energy must be less than the original input.
Precisely.
The only alternate I can imagine is that a combination of hydrogen and gasoline in the engine causes the gasoline to burn more effectively, creating a net MPG benefit.
The injection of hydrogen is very small, and the primary effect is to improve your driving habits, with the result that you may get better mpg.
Bob S
 
Razzor7 said:
If you use the alternator to hydrolysis water and then run the oxygen/hydrogen into the engine, is there any way for this to improve your gas mileage?
No

but on the surface it appears that energy must be lost.
Correct

But this amount of energy must be less than the original input.
Also correct

The only alternate I can imagine is that a combination of hydrogen and gasoline in the engine causes the gasoline to burn more effectively, creating a net MPG benefit.
The only alternative is that they are a con
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top