Improving Speed and Scores on SAT Math and Chemistry Tests

  • Context: Testing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bubbles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sat Sat math
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on strategies for improving speed and scores on the SAT Math and Chemistry tests. Participants share their experiences, concerns about pacing, and suggestions for preparation methods, including the use of calculators and practice techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty keeping pace on the SAT Math test, noting a previous score of 670 with unfinished questions.
  • Concerns are raised about the topics covered on the SAT Chemistry test, particularly in relation to prior college chemistry coursework.
  • Some participants discuss the use of calculators, with mixed opinions on their necessity and the rules surrounding calculator programs during the test.
  • A suggestion is made to practice with old exams to improve speed, with one participant mentioning that playing timed computer games helped improve focus.
  • Another participant mentions that they didn't find their graphing calculator necessary during the test, indicating varying experiences with calculator usage.
  • Several participants share frustrations about running out of time or making mistakes due to rushing during exams.
  • A recommendation is made to use Barron's prep book for Math II, with the idea that thorough preparation can lead to higher scores on the actual test.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of timed practice exams as a method to improve test-taking speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of practice for improving speed, but there is no consensus on the effectiveness or necessity of calculators and calculator programs during the test. Additionally, experiences with pacing and test strategies vary among participants.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions include assumptions about the current rules of the SAT, which may change over time. The effectiveness of different preparation methods and the impact of calculator usage on performance are also not universally agreed upon.

bubbles
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to practice doing the SAT math 2 this summer, and I realize that I just couldn't keep up with the pace of the test. I took the test once and I got a 670 with 10 questions that I didn't have a chance to finish.

I also want to take the chemistry portion of the SAT, but I have never taken a high school chemistry class, just one semester of college chemistry. What topics are on the SAT chemistry test but not in 1st semester college chemistry?

I generally have a hard time keeping pace on math tests and am often the last one to finish (since I'm use to taking tests with no time limits). Any suggestions to improve my scores is highly appreciated. :smile:

P.S. Since calculators are allowed in the test, how important is the use of calculators on the test, especially calculator programs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I remember, they don't let you use calculator programs. I'm not even sure they let you use calculators!
 
Unless they've changed the test, you are allowed to use a graphing calculator so long as it does not have a QWERTY keyboard. I don't think that custom programs beyond the basic capabilities of the calculator will either do you much good or be fair though.

If you're slow I recommend practicing. Get copies of old exams and do them. It shouldn't be too hard to increase your speed by a factor of 2 or 3 with enough practice. Personally I found that playing timed computer solitaire improved my focus.
 
Pengwuino said:
From what I remember, they don't let you use calculator programs. I'm not even sure they let you use calculators!

Actually, calculators and calculator programs are allowed only on the math test. I only have a TI-83+ while some people use their TI-89 on the test. The tests puts certain people at a disadvantage...
 
Wait, i remember when i took it. I didn't even need my graphing calculator for it... i was a little dissappointed because i had figured out how to do a lot of neat things with it.
 
You are allowed to use a calculator, but I don't think that I used mine very much when I took the test, and when I did it was only for fairly simple things.
 
You can only hit time limits in tests with tediously, practising the tests over and over again :frown: :frown: :frown:
 
J77 said:
You can only hit time limits in tests with tediously, practising the tests over and over again :frown: :frown: :frown:
That's my main problem in examinations, I either run out of time or rush through making stupid mistakes :frown: :frown: :frown:
 
Hootenanny said:
That's my main problem in examinations, I either run out of time or rush through making stupid mistakes :frown: :frown: :frown:
Yeah - I don't think it's fair.

However, with so many people from all over the world wanting to take exams and have comparable scores, to mark against each other, sadly I see no better way at the moment... :frown:
 
  • #10
Get Barron's prep book for Math II. Most people say its overprepares you a lot, but that's not really a disadvantage. Once you can get about a 700 on a Barron's test, you can be pretty sure that your capable of getting 800 on the real one (the ridiculous curve makes the test very easy to score high on).
 
  • #11
to practice your speed, do some practice exams with a timer. as far as i know, the only way to improve that skill is to practice that way, especially since you are unaccustomed to that manner of testing.

good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K