Incorrect lecture notes relating Bandwidth with speed?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
ericeng
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello PF. Thanks for reading.

My understanding of Bandwidth in the context in which I learn it (Analogue and Digital Communications) is that it is the spectral width of a signal, BW = f[upper] - f[lower].

However, my lecture notes then define 'fundamental limitations' as,

Bandwidth:
- A measure of "speed"
- When a signal changes rapidly with time, the frequency content (or spectrum) extends over a wide range; i.e. has "large bandwidth"
- The faster data is sent, the more bandwidth it uses (is needed)

This confuses me. I don't get how bandwidth is a measure of speed, other than how frequency in general relates to signals in the time domain. Are the bullet points above factually correct?

How rapidly a signal changes with time only determines at which frequency(s) it lies, not the width of the range of frequencies?

I understand how sending data faster could require more bandwidth; by increasing bandwidth, more simultaneous signals could be sent. But to say that increasing the speed of transmission will result in an increase in bandwidth, I just don't understand that.

Insight is most welcome.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
- When a signal changes rapidly with time, the frequency content (or spectrum) extends over a wide range; i.e. has "large bandwidth"
This isn't strictly true since a high frequency sinusoid "changes rapidly with time" but its spectral content is limited to a single frequency. It is, however, true for a trapezoidal waveform (which is a common approximation used for digital signals) - as you decrease its rise time, you increase the bandwidth (using your definition) of the waveform.

- The faster data is sent, the more bandwidth it uses (is needed)
I think its fair to say that higher bandwidth provides for more throughput. I understand "faster" in this context to mean an increase in data transmission rate.

But to say that increasing the speed of transmission will result in an increase in bandwidth, I just don't understand that.
What do you mean by 'speed of transmission'?
 
milesyoung said:
This isn't strictly true since a high frequency sinusoid "changes rapidly with time" but its spectral content is limited to a single frequency. It is, however, true for a trapezoidal waveform (which is a common approximation used for digital signals) - as you decrease its rise time, you increase the bandwidth (using your definition) of the waveform.

Okay, this I understand. Thanks.
milesyoung said:
I think its fair to say that higher bandwidth provides for more throughput. I understand "faster" in this context to mean an increase in data transmission rate.

So shouldn't this read that the more data sent simultaneously, the more bandwidth is required? Because the data could be being transmitted at the same rate but more data per unit time could result as an increase in bandwidth? ''Speed'' seems like the wrong word here. It's like suggesting "speed" is the cause of faster transmission due to a shorter cable.

milesyoung said:
What do you mean by 'speed of transmission'?

Sorry, by speed I meant rate as you used above, not propagation speed.
 
If I saw those slides/notes, I would just think "speed" was used as a kind of umbrella term for rise time, data transmission rate etc. - just a way to get you to think of "things that move/change fast".

It doesn't strictly make sense but it _is_ presented in quotes ;)
 
Okay, thanks for your replies. I also came across the Shannon-Hartley theorem which defines channel capacity in bits/s. BW goes up, bits/s goes up. Simple!