Independent parameters of the rotation tensor ##R_{ij}##

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the independent parameters of the rotation tensor R_{ij}. The initial approach involved writing the rotation matrix as a 3x3 square matrix and applying the orthogonality condition, leading to nine equations for the parameters. However, many of these equations are not independent, primarily due to the symmetric nature of the Kronecker delta. Ultimately, it is concluded that there are three independent parameters in the rotation matrix after accounting for the six independent constraints. This analysis highlights the relationship between the number of variables and the constraints imposed by the properties of the rotation tensor.
brotherbobby
Messages
755
Reaction score
170
Homework Statement
Show how the ##\text{orthogonality condition}## of the rotation matrix ##R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta _{jk}## diminishes up to ##\mathbf{three}## the number of independent parameters of the matrix.
Relevant Equations
An arbitrary vector ##\vec x## upon rotated by the matrix ##\mathbb R## results in a new vector ##\vec x'## given by ##\vec x' = \mathbb{R} \vec x##, or in component notation : ##x'_i = \rm R_{ij} x_j##, where ##\rm R_{ij}## are the components of the rotation matrix.

Due to orthogonality, these components satisfy the requirement : ##R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta _{jk}##.
I am afraid I had no credible attempt at solving the problem.

My poor attempt was writing the matrix ##\mathbb R## as a ##3 \times 3## square matrix with elements ##a_{ij}## and use the matrix form of the orthogonality relation ##\mathbb R^T \mathbb R = \mathbb I##, where ##\mathbb I## is the identity matrix with diagonal elements 1 and off diagonal elements 0. Those a's are the parameters of the rotation matrix. I obtained 9 equations for the a's, some identical, but found that almost all the a's would cancel to leave only 1 independent component!

Any help would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This type of problem can be solved simply by counting the number of independent parameters that you start with (which I hope you've already realized is ##3\times 3 = 9##), and subtracting the number of independent constraint equations, which in this case is ... ?

Hint: is ##\delta_{jk}## symmetric, anti-symmetric, or neither?
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, etotheipi and vanhees71
Very sorry for the late reply. Thank you for the hint above, which really leads easily to the solution.

We know that the set of relations (constraints) that variables have, lead to a decline in how many of them are independent. The more such relations (expressed as equations), the lower the number of independent variables involved.

In our problem above, these variables are the components of the rotation tensor ##R_{ij}##. But they satisfy some relations, compactly written as ##R_{ij} R_{ik} = \delta_{jk}##. How many relations are these? Nine, on first glance, but they are not all independent. The kronecker tensor being symmetric, we have the number of independent equations as its number of independent components : ##N = \tfrac{3(3+1)}{4} = 6##.

These six relations serve to reduce the number of independent parameters of the rotation matrix by ##9 - 6 = \boxed{3}##.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K