Independent Trials: Probability of Events A_i

  • Thread starter Thread starter IniquiTrance
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Independent
IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Say I have an urn containing a set of balls numbered 1 through N. I then make n selections from the urn with replacement. Thus each selection is independent.

Let the event: A_{i}
i=1,2,3...,N

be that the ball numbered i was not chosen in the n selections.

Then:

P(\mathbf{A_{i}})=\left(\frac{N-1}{N}\right)^{n}

and P(\mathbf{A_{i}A_{j}})=\left(\frac{N-2}{N}\right)^n} and so on...

But aren't the events A_{i} i=1,2,3...,N independent as well?

So shouldn't the probability of
P(\mathbf{A_{i}A_{j}})=P(\mathbf{A_{i}})P(\mathbf{A_{j}})=\left(\frac{N-1}{N}\right)^{2n}=\left(\frac{2(N-1)}{N}\right)^{n}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have just proved that the events A_i and A_j are not independent.

If they were then the probability of no colours being chosen would be

(\frac{N-1}{N})^{nN}[/itex]<br /> <br /> but this exprssion is obviously not 0.<br /> <br /> (Intuitively failing to draw one colour increases the chances of drawing each of the others.)
 
Martin Rattigan said:
You have just proved that the events A_i and A_j are not independent.

If they were then the probability of no colours being chosen would be

(\frac{N-1}{N})^{nN}[/itex]<br /> <br /> but this exprssion is obviously not 0.<br /> <br /> (Intuitively failing to draw one colour increases the chances of drawing each of the others.)
<br /> <br /> Ah ok. Thanks!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top