I've already posted a couple of index notation questions on here and I've gotten very helpful responses. So I thought I'd try my lucky again, though I'm a little more stumped on this question than I was on the others...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let [itex]\vec{x}[/itex] be the position vector and [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] the radial unit vector. In index notation, I find myself confronted with simplifying

[tex]

x_k \partial_i r_k.

[/tex]

I desperately want this to be zero, but I can't figure out why it should be. (I can't really figure out what this represents at all, as a matter of fact.) Isn't [itex]\partial_i r_k[/itex] a 2 by 2 matrix? And if so, how would multiplying with [itex]x_k[/itex] make everything go away? Again, maybe it doesn't.

Can anyone help?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Index notation is driving me CRAZY!

Loading...

Similar Threads - Index notation driving | Date |
---|---|

I Notation (index notation) | Mar 18, 2016 |

Matrix multiplication: index / suffix notation issues! | Apr 11, 2013 |

Division using index notation | Sep 21, 2012 |

Index notation | May 12, 2012 |

List of index notation properties ? | Nov 20, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**