Induced Electric Field work done

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a time-varying magnetic field and the work done by an external agent on a charged particle in a cylindrical region. The context includes concepts from electromagnetism, specifically Faraday's law and induced electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between the induced electric field and the work done on the charged particle, questioning the integration process and the application of Maxwell's law. There are attempts to clarify the derivation of the electric field and the calculation of work done, with some participants suggesting the need for integration over varying angles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and interpretations. There is a focus on correcting misunderstandings regarding the application of Faraday's law and the proper evaluation of integrals. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored, indicating a collaborative effort to clarify the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the geometry of the problem and the nature of the electric field generated by the changing magnetic field. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the particle's movement and the varying angles involved in the calculations.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a cylindrical region of radius R, there exists a time varying magnetic field B such that dB/dt=k(>0) . A charged particle having charge q is placed at the point P at a distance d (> R) from its centre O. Now, the particle is moved in the direction perpendicular to OP (see figure) by an external agent upto infinity so that there is no gain in kinetic energy of the charged particle. Show that the work done by the external agent is independent of d and find it.

attachment.php?attachmentid=34003&stc=1&d=1301911890.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



Let the angle between the line joining the particle to the point O make an angle θ with the vertical.

E.dl=-kπR2
E*x*cos(180-θ)=-kπR2, where x is horizontal distance of the particle from the initial position.
Substituting x for dtanθ and solving, I get W= qkπR2 which is incorrect.

The answer given is qkπR2/4
 

Attachments

  • 7e3871af-bc7c-489b-ab69-7c721a7e4af1.jpg
    7e3871af-bc7c-489b-ab69-7c721a7e4af1.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 669
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your calculated E? How come I see no integration over cycle when you are clearly using Maxwell's Law? That's a blatant error,sorry.
 
E=kπR2/xcosθ
Which integration are you talking about?
 
E*x*cos(180-θ)=-kπR2
Ambiguous since Maxwell's Law is to be applied only to fixed mathematical loops.

Anyways since the angle force vector makes with the displacement is varying you will have to integrate to get the work.
 
Explain how you went from
Abdul Quadeer said:
E.dl=-kπR2
to
E*x*cos(180-θ)=-kπR2, where x is horizontal distance of the particle from the initial position.
As aim1732 has suggested, you're not evaluating the LHS correctly. You can use Faraday's law to calculate E as a function of the displacement r. Once you have that, you can then find the force on the charge as a function of the displacement r and integrate it to find the work done.
 
Ambiguous since Maxwell's Law is to be applied only to fixed mathematical loops.

But the particle is not moving along a loop here. Sorry I don't understand your point.


Explain how you went from...

At any instant, let the particle be at P distant 'x' from the initial point. E at that point has the direction as shown.

attachment.php?attachmentid=34030&stc=1&d=1301951556.jpg


dl vector is directed along the path traveled by the particle. I just used the dot product of two vectors.
 

Attachments

  • 12.jpg
    12.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 639
Faraday's Law says

\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{l} = -\frac{\partial \Phi_{B,S}}{\partial t}

where S is a surface and ∂S is the closed boundary of that surface. The expression -kπR2 is equal to the rate of change of flux, but your calculation of the line integral is wrong. The path the particle travels has nothing to do with the boundary of S.
 
Ok.
What is the correct expression?
 
First separately derive the electric field at a distance r from the centre of vortex. Then write out the differential work in terms of r and angle b/w displacement and force. Eliminate angle and integrate under proper limits..

By the way the existence of a vortex has absolutely nothing to do with the whether there is a charged particle at that point or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K