Inductive and capacitive reactance

  • Thread starter Thread starter fonz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
Why is it that capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance and not the other way around when determining the overall reactance?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is the formula for capacitive reactance?

With a j in the denominator, the term becomes negative when you bring it to the numerator.

Understand?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonz
fonz said:
Why is it that capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance and not the other way around when determining the overall reactance?
Reactances in series add. Inductive reactance has a + associated with it, and capacitive reactance has a – associated with it. They keep these signs when you add them, and the result can end up being a net + or a net – depending on the magnitudes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonz
fonz said:
Why is it that capacitive reactance is subtracted from inductive reactance and not the other way around when determining the overall reactance?

Have you been yet introduced to phasor notation?

The answer to your question is "By Convention"
and it's related to the physical facts that
current leads voltage in capacitors
and
current lags voltage in inductors .

So a long long time ago the heavy thinkers {Steinmetz i think it was and Tesla picked right up on it)
decided that capacitance would get the minus sign and inductance the positive sign . Consistency kept their algebra simple. We never changed.

Be rigorous in your arithmetic and form good math habits. It'll pay off.

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonz