Inductor behavior connected directly to DC (no resistor)?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
ME77
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If an ideal inductor is connected directly (no resistor present) to a DC voltage source, why does it behave like a short-circuit at time t=0? If voltage across an inductor is related to the change in current (i.e. di/dt), then shouldn't the voltage across the inductor be very large at time t=0 because the current goes from zero to some value instantaneously (assume no resistor is series). This would imply that the inductor should act like an open-circuit at time t=0. Wouldn't the inductor oppose the initial current spike and prevent the initial current from flowing? I know that this is not true; however, I am trying to determine why not.

Thanks for your help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ME77 said:
If an ideal inductor is connected directly (no resistor present) to a DC voltage source, why does it behave like a short-circuit at time t=0? If voltage across an inductor is related to the change in current (i.e. di/dt), then shouldn't the voltage across the inductor be very large at time t=0 because the current goes from zero to some value instantaneously (assume no resistor is series). This would imply that the inductor should act like an open-circuit at time t=0. Wouldn't the inductor oppose the initial current spike and prevent the initial current from flowing? I know that this is not true; however, I am trying to determine why not.

Thanks for your help.

It is neither a short nor an open. Can you write the equation that relates the current through the inductor to the voltage across it?
 
berkeman said:
It is neither a short nor an open. Can you write the equation that relates the current through the inductor to the voltage across it?

berkeman - The equation is I(t) = Vc/R * (1-e^(-t*L/R)). Using the equation, I understand that the current becomes infinity (or indeterminate) when R=0. However, I am trying to understand what physically is happening. If R=0, does a magnetic field still form when current flows through an ideal conductor? Thanks.
 
ME77 said:
berkeman - The equation is I(t) = Vc/R * (1-e^(-t*L/R)). Using the equation, I understand that the current becomes infinity (or indeterminate) when R=0. However, I am trying to understand what physically is happening. If R=0, does a magnetic field still form when current flows through an ideal conductor? Thanks.

I had a more fundamental equation in mind:

[tex]v(t) = L \frac{di(t)}{dt}[/tex]

That's the way I think about inductors. What happens when you apply a step voltage across an inductor?

BTW -- the current through the ideal inductor only becomes infinite in infinite time. It is a linear ramp from t=0 to whenever. And with real inductors, the current is limited by the inductor's series resistance (check the datasheets for this number) and the source voltage.
 
ME77 said:
This would imply that the inductor should act like an open-circuit at time t=0. Wouldn't the inductor oppose the initial current spike and prevent the initial current from flowing? I know that this is not true; however, I am trying to determine why not.

It is true and your thoughts to the contrary are incorrect. Why do you think the ideal inductor conducts at t=0? It starts with 0 current and ramps linearly while building a magnetic field.

What caused your mixup?
 
Last edited by a moderator: