Inelastic Collision with Friction in car accident

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 23K views
Abarak
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are called as an expert witness to analyze the following auto accident: Car B, of mass 2100 [tex]kg[/tex], was stopped at a red light when it was hit from behind by car A, of mass 1400 [tex]kg[/tex]. The cars locked bumpers during the collision and slid to a stop. Measurements of the skid marks left by the tires showed them to be 7.25 [tex]m[/tex] long, and inspection of the tire tread revealed that the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the road was 0.650.

What was the speed ([tex]v[/tex]) of car A ([tex]mph[/tex]) just before the collision?

By how many [tex]mph[/tex] was car A exceeding the speed limit 35.0 [tex]mph[/tex]?


Homework Equations



I have tried
1.) [tex]m_1 v_1i + m_2 v_2i = (m_1+m_2)v_f[/tex] (does not work)
2.) [tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex] (does not work)

The Attempt at a Solution



The first equation above I know will not work because it was designed for a perfect inelastic collision. I need to take into account the friction, that is why I used equation two.

[tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex]
[tex]v_f = 0 m/s[/tex]
[tex]v_0 = ?[/tex] (need to find for problem #1)
[tex]U_k = 0.650[/tex]
[tex]g = 9.8 m/s^2[/tex]
[tex]D = 7.25m[/tex]

Any ideas to what I could be doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abarak said:
The first equation above I know will not work because it was designed for a perfect inelastic collision. I need to take into account the friction, that is why I used equation two.
You need both of those equations. First there is an inelastic collision (equation #1), then there is sliding (equation #2).

Work backwards!

[tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex]
[tex]v_f = 0 m/s[/tex]
[tex]v_0 = ?[/tex] (need to find for problem #1)
[tex]U_k = 0.650[/tex]
[tex]g = 9.8 m/s^2[/tex]
[tex]D = 7.25m[/tex]
Good. Solve for v_0, which is the speed of the stuck cars after the collision.
 
Hmmm... now I understand. [tex]v_0[/tex] in problem 2 = [tex]v_f[/tex] in problem 1.

Problem 2:
[tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex]
[tex]v_0 = 6.647 m/s[/tex]

Problem 1:
[tex]m_1 v_1i + m_2 v_2i = (m_1+m_2)v_f[/tex]
[tex]1400 v_1i + 2100*0 = (1400+2100)6.647[/tex]
[tex]v_1i = 16.618 m/s[/tex]

is 16.618 m/s right?
 
Abarak said:
Hmmm... now I understand. [tex]v_0[/tex] in problem 2 = [tex]v_f[/tex] in problem 1.
Exactly.

Problem 2:
[tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex]
[tex]v_0 = 6.647 m/s[/tex]
Correct approach, but revisit your calculation. (I think you forgot to multiply by 2.)

Problem 1:
[tex]m_1 v_1i + m_2 v_2i = (m_1+m_2)v_f[/tex]
[tex]1400 v_1i + 2100*0 = (1400+2100)6.647[/tex]
[tex]v_1i = 16.618 m/s[/tex]
Also the correct approach. But redo with revised numbers.

And when you're done you'll have to convert from m/s to mph in order to answer the questions.
 
First I wanted to just say thanks for the help!

When I perform the calculation for [tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex] I always get 6.647 m/s ??

[tex]v_f = 0 m/s[/tex]
[tex]v_0 = ?[/tex]
[tex]U_k = 0.650[/tex]
[tex]g = 9.8 m/s^2[/tex]
[tex]D = 7.25m[/tex]

[tex]0^2-v_o^2=2-0.650*9.8*7.25[/tex] = 6.647 m/s ?

(I think you forgot to multiply by 2.)
Where do I multiply by 2?

Also, thanks for the heads up on the unit conversion. I almost forgot.
 
Abarak said:
Where do I multiply by 2?
Right here:
When I perform the calculation for [tex]v_f^2-v_o^2=2-U_k(g)D[/tex] I always get 6.647 m/s ??
Spot the 2!
Let me rewrite that equation more clearly:
[tex]v_f^2-v_o^2= -2 \mu_k g D[/tex]
 
Thanks for the help Doc Al!

I was able to get the right answer of 53.748 mph for question 1 and 18.8 mph for question 2.
 
Thx this hlp me solved similar question.But may i ask why we should consider the acceleration as 9.8 m/s^2 ?
 
kahwei said:
But may i ask why we should consider the acceleration as 9.8 m/s^2 ?
Who says the acceleration is 9.8 m/s^2? (That's g, a constant describing the Earth's gravity.)
 
kahwei said:
Thx this hlp me solved similar question.But may i ask why we should consider the acceleration as 9.8 m/s^2 ?

Because the average gravity of Earth is approximately 9.8 m/s2, (9.80665). Oh well, the vertical acceleration. Therefore, it's might be considered as convenient. What do I know. ^_^
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth