Inequality involving positive definite operator

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
1.
Given that [tex]|\langle f|g\rangle|^2 \leqslant \langle f|f\rangle\langle g|g\rangle[/tex]
prove that [tex]|\langle f|H|g\rangle|^2 \leqslant \langle f|H|f\rangle \langle g|H|g\rangle[/tex]
where [tex]H[/tex] is a Hermitian and positive definite operator.




3. I tried to identify [tex]H|g\rangle[/tex] as a state and put it into the given inequality, but not so help.

Is there any ideas to prove this inequality? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about trying sqrt(H)?

You will also need to think about the conditions H should meet for its square root to exist.
 
weejee said:
How about trying sqrt(H)?

You will also need to think about the conditions H should meet for its square root to exist.

Thank you so much!
I got it, and in this way, Hermitian and positive definite properties are both used.
Thanks!
 
The problem is kind of silly to begin with. If you can show that

[tex]\langle \cdot | H | \cdot \rangle[/tex]

satisfies the defining properties of an inner product:

1. Positive definite,

2. Linear on second slot,

3. Conjugate-linear on first slot,

then the expression automatically obeys the Schwartz inequality, because the Schwartz inequality is true of inner products in general.
 
Ben Niehoff said:
The problem is kind of silly to begin with. If you can show that

[tex]\langle \cdot | H | \cdot \rangle[/tex]

satisfies the defining properties of an inner product:

1. Positive definite,

2. Linear on second slot,

3. Conjugate-linear on first slot,

then the expression automatically obeys the Schwartz inequality, because the Schwartz inequality is true of inner products in general.


Well, you are right. I keep forget that an inner product doesn't always have to be what we usually consider as 'the inner product'.