Inequality Proof: Max {A+B,C} ≤ Max {A,C} + Max {B,C}

  • Thread starter Thread starter stanley.st
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The inequality Max {A+B,C} ≤ Max {A,C} + Max {B,C} is under scrutiny for its validity with real numbers A, B, and C. It is confirmed to hold true when A, B, and C are nonnegative. However, counterexamples arise when negative values are introduced, indicating that the inequality does not universally apply. The discussion suggests exploring specific cases where Max {A+B,C} equals A+B or C to identify scenarios that challenge the inequality. Overall, the inequality's validity is conditional and requires careful consideration of the values involved.
stanley.st
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i've met during problem solving with inequality

\max\{A+B,C\}\le\max\{A,C\}+\max\{B,C\}

where A,B and C are real numbers. I don't know whether it holds, but I need to prove that.

Thanks for reply...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It holds if A,B,C are nonnegative, but play around with some negative numbers and you'll find a counterexample. (Hint: Does the inequality always hold if max{A+B,C}=A+B, or if max{A+B,C}=C? Pick the case you can't prove easily and search for counterexamples there.)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top