Infinite Acceleration, Conservation of Energy, and Negative Mass

Raze
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've read that the Alcubierre Drive depends on the existence of negative mass, but I've seen that physicists say it could violate the conservation of energy. Their reasoning is that basically a negative mass and positive mass would interact in a perpetual motion sort of way that eternally decreases entropy, that they'd accelerate infinitely.

I was wondering if someone here could help do a kinematics demonstration of that and why such perpetual motion would come of it and why it violates conservation of energy.

I guess I'll start my own attempt to understand with Newton's gravitational law. Suppose these two particles (one with negative mass) are close enough that if they were normal they'd attract.

F = -Gm1m2/r2

except m2 < 0, so I'll add a negative sign.

Then F = Gm1m2/r2

which should mean they repel away from each other, right? If that negative sign were still there, we could have

a = -F/m1 = -Gm2/r2,​

which would mean they would accelerate at a constant rate until they hit each other, right? If the negative is removed, that means they'd accelerate at a constant rate away from each other, right? Then how is this infinite acceleration? It seems it's just a constant acceleration away from each other.
Or is it that merely adding a negative sign isn't enough to describe how negative mass would behave? If it were more like negative mass always repels negative mass, and positive mass always attracts positive mass, then would mixing the two would result in a repulsive AND attractive force? If so I can see why that could be a conundrum.

But if the masses were of different magnitude, wouldn't either the repulsive or attractive force win out, resulting in more or less "normal" energy situations? And if the masses were of equal magnitude, wouldn't the repulsion and attraction exactly cancel in this scenario? (resulting in a net of zero kinetic energy)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top