Infinite array of charged wires

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical treatment of an infinite array of parallel charged wires, specifically focusing on the derivation of the function F(n) in the context of the electric field above the array. Participants explore different methods, including Fourier series and delta functions, to find this function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references the Feynman Lectures, noting that F(n) is not explicitly provided and expresses confusion about how to derive it.
  • Another participant suggests representing the charged wires as an array of delta functions and proposes a method to find F(n) using Fourier series.
  • A different participant claims to have solved for F(n) using a different approach, stating that the delta function method does not yield the correct result and provides an alternative expression for F(n).
  • One participant acknowledges that their delta function approach was incorrect, indicating that Fourier coefficients of the potential are necessary instead of the charge density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct method to derive F(n). There are competing views regarding the use of delta functions versus direct manipulation of the series for the electric field.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the different approaches, particularly concerning the use of delta functions and the nature of the Fourier coefficients required for the potential.

Fr33Fa11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
In the Feynman Lectures, Volume II, Chapter 7, the final two pages (7-10 and 7-11), Feynman describes an infinite array of parallel charged wires and uses a Fourier series to solve for the field above them. He shows that the series can be expressed entirely in terms of cosine terms and that the coefficients have the value F(n)*e^(-z/k) where n is the order of the term, z is the distance from the plane of the wires, and k is a constant. What I don't understand is how one would then find the function F(n) (which he does not show). Later (in chapter 12 of the same volume) says that F(1) is twice the average field strength and that solving for the function F(n) is straightforward (in relation to another, related problem).
How would you go about solving for the function?
I've found the field via the coulomb interaction at several points where symmetry makes it easy but I'm not sure how this helps.
Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The parallel charged wires can be represented as an array of delta functions spaced a apart (times \lambda, the linear charge density of the wires). Then it would just be the Fourier Series of a delta function.

<br /> F_n = \frac{2}{a} \int_{-a/2}^{a/2} \lambda\delta(x) \cos \frac{2n\pi x}{a} \, dx = 2\lambda<br />
 
I just solved it last night. The delta function approach doesn't produce the correct answer; F(n)=lambda/(2pi*n*epsilon_0) (sorry I'm not sure how to embed latex into the forums). I found this by manipulating the infinite series for the field a distance a directly above one of the wires into a form which, when expanded, gave a function along the lines of e^(-n). (The field is related to the hyperbolic cotangent of pi*z/a).
 
You're right. My delta function approach doesn't work because the Fourier coefficients of the potential are what's needed, not the charge density.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
533
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
476
Replies
92
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K