Infinite series by integration by parts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the hypothesis regarding the evaluation of integrals involving infinite series through integration by parts. The key assertion is that if the limit of the product of the (n+1)th anti-derivative of a function \( f_0 \) and the nth derivative of a function \( g_0 \) approaches zero over continuous intervals, then the integral can be expressed as a converging series. The participants explore the implications of the Mean Value Theorem and the conditions under which the limits of these functions behave predictably, particularly when considering cases where the limits may not converge to zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Familiarity with the Mean Value Theorem
  • Knowledge of limits and convergence in calculus
  • Concept of anti-derivatives and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Mean Value Theorem in integration
  • Explore convergence criteria for infinite series in calculus
  • Investigate the properties of anti-derivatives and their implications in integration
  • Learn about the behavior of limits involving products of functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and educators interested in advanced integration techniques and the behavior of infinite series in mathematical analysis.

disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
Hi, I wonder if this hypothesis is true:

Let f_n be an arbitrarily chosen n'th anti-derivative of the function f_0. Similarly, let g_n be the n'th derivative of the function g_0.

Now, \int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0]^b_a-\int^b_a f_1g_1 \rm{d}x=[f_1g_0-f_2g_1+...]^b_a+(-1)^n \int^b_a f_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x.

hypothesis:

If \lim_{n \to \infty} f_{n+1}g_n =0 for all continuous intervals of and never diverges. Then

\int^b_a f_0 g_0 \rm{d}x = [\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} (-1)^n f_{n+1}g_n]^b_a

This seems intuitively correct, but I wonder how to prove it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking Mean Value Theorem. The integral equals \epsilon(b-a)(f_{n+1}g_n)|_{x=c} for some c in the interval [a, b] and 0 \leq \epsilon \leq 1 which approaches zero.
 
this was double post, sorry
 
Last edited:
Excellent, thank you.

We have by induction that

\int^b_a f_0g_0 \rm{d}x = [\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(-1)^n\int^b_af_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x=[\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(b-a)(f_{n+1} \circ g_n)(t)

For some t \in [a,b], and any non-negative integer n.

However, \lim_{n \to \infty} (f_{n+1} \circ g_{n} )(t)=0 is given, so

\int^b_a f_0g_0 \rm{d}x = \lim_{n \to \infty} \int^b_a f_0g_0 \rm{d}x= \lim_{n \to \infty} [\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(-1)^n\int^b_af_{n+1}g_n \rm{d}x=\lim_{n \to \infty}[\sum^{n-1}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a+(b-a)(f_{n+1} \circ g_n)(t)=[\sum^{\infty}_{k=0} (-1)^kf_{k+1}g_{k}]^b_a

But this is not so obvious if \lim_{n \to \infty} (f_{n+1} \circ g_{n} )(t) not always equal 0 i.e. is finite for discrete values of x, or if either of the limits are infinite. Can someone help me there?

Perhaps if the limits are infinite, we can let n tend towards infinity at a rate which make f_{n+1}g_n dominate a limit, say b i.e. so \lim_{b,n \to \infty} b \cdot f_{n+1}g_n = 0 Can we choose it to be like that?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K