Infinite Square Well with Multiple Particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating energy levels in an infinite square well for a system with multiple particles, specifically seven electrons. The initial calculation using the formula En = (h2*n2) / (8*m*L2) yielded an incorrect energy value of E1 = 0.06017 eV. The error was identified as failing to account for the presence of seven electrons in the system. After acknowledging the mistake, the user successfully resolved the issue. This highlights the importance of considering particle interactions in quantum mechanics calculations.
sarahjohn
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
An infinitely deep square well has width L = 2.5 nm. The potential energy is V = 0 eV inside the well (i.e., for 0 ≤ x ≤ L). Seven electrons are trapped in the well.

1)What is the ground state (lowest) energy of this seven electron system?
2)What is the energy of the first excited state of the system?
NOTE: The first excited state is the one that has the lowest energy that is larger than the ground state energy.
3)What is the energy of the second excited state of the system?
Relevant Equations
En = (h^2 * n^2) / (8 * m * L^2)
Using the equation En = (h2*n2 ) / (8*m*L2), I got that E1 = 0.06017eV but the answer is not correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you taken into account that you have seven electrons?
 
TSny said:
Have you taken into account that you have seven electrons?
I realized that was my mistake and figured it out. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and hutchphd
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top