Probability of Finding a Particle in a Small Interval in an Infinite Square Well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the probability of finding a particle in a specific interval within an infinite square well, specifically when the particle is in the n=1 state. The interval in question is Δx = 0.006L at the position x = 3L/4.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of integration given the small interval and question the limits of integration. There are attempts to clarify the setup and the implications of the sine function's behavior within the interval.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their integration attempts and questioning the results. Some express confusion about the integration limits and the expected probability values, while others provide insights into the nature of the sine function in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of uncertainty regarding the integration limits and the interpretation of the probability density function. Participants are also reflecting on the implications of the sine function's characteristics in relation to the probability calculation.

Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A particle is in the n=1 state in an infinite square well of size L. What is the probability of finding the particle in the interval Δx = .006L at the point x = 3L/4?

Homework Equations


ψ(x) =√(2/L) sin(nπx/L)

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem states that because Δx is very small I don't need to do any integration. I've been integrating anyway because it's fun in this particular case- but my problem is what to do with x = 3L/4. I've integrated up to x= 0.006L in ψ2(x) and I'm getting the correct answer for if the particle was at x=L/2. What do I do here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You show your work and then we can comment :smile:. 'up to x = 0.006 L' makes me feel uneasy: up to x = 0.006 L from where ?
 
So here is the integration from 0 to 0.006L. I tried the integration from 0.006L to 3L/4 also and I am getting a number greater than 1...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_17111.jpg
    IMG_17111.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 468
Holy **** the answer was simply 0.006. can you please explain this to me?
 
Disaster ! But the original exercise asks about probability to find the bugger in an interval of width 0.006 L at 3/L/4 , so I would be reassured if you integrated from 0.75 L to 0.7506 : or so. Since the sine varies only little in uch a small interval, you can just take the value. But, if I may ask: what do you integrate (what's the integrand) ? (edit: never mind, iI can see you do it right from the grey-on grey picture). Now about the value.
 
I figured that since at L/2 there would be the highest probability at that point. At 3L/4 you're a little bit further right in the well and since the probability of finding a particle represents a sine wave then it would have to be a number smaller than what I got integrating from 0 to 0.006L (which was twice 0.006L) but how are you to know that it's at exactly 0.006L?
 
Doesn't sound good to me, but I can be wrong...
[edit] no, sounds good to me. Why ?
 
The integrand is √(2/L) sin2 (nπx/L)
 
Vitani11 said:
So here is the integration from 0 to 0.006L. I tried the integration from 0.006L to 3L/4 also and I am getting a number greater than 1...
You missed a factor 1/2: ##\quad{\bf 2} \sin^2x = 1-\cos 2x##

[edit] and the numerics look mistaken too: for small x , ##\ x-1/2 \sin2x ## should be closer to 0.
 
  • #10
Vitani11 said:
The integrand is √(2/L) sin2 (nπx/L)
so at 3L/4 that sine squared is 1/2, and ## {2\over L } {1\over 2 } 0.006 L = 0.006 ##

Simple exercise, lots to learn !. (not only you, me 2)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vitani11
  • #11
I see. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K