Infinite sum of squares converges

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the space L2, defined as the set of all infinite sequences of real numbers whose sum of squares converges, is a metric space. The user is tasked with demonstrating that the distance function d(x,y) = √Σ (xi - yi)² satisfies the properties of a metric. Key challenges include proving the convergence of Σ (xi*yi) and the triangle inequality d(p,q) < d(p,r) + d(r,q). The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality is identified as a crucial tool for overcoming these obstacles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L2 space and its properties
  • Familiarity with metric space definitions
  • Knowledge of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
  • Experience with infinite series and convergence criteria
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in detail
  • Explore proofs of the triangle inequality in metric spaces
  • Review convergence tests for infinite series
  • Investigate properties of L2 spaces and their applications in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying functional analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of metric spaces and convergence in infinite-dimensional settings.

rjw5002

Homework Statement


So, L2 is defined to be the set of all infinite sequences of real numbers, s.t. the sum of their squares converges:
L2 = {x=(x1,...,xn,...) | \Sigmaxi < \infty}
we have d(x,y) = \sqrt{\Sigma (xi-yi)^2}

I need to show that this is a metric, starting by showing that if xi,yi\in then xi-yi\in

Homework Equations



definition of a metric

The Attempt at a Solution


so my initial problem was with the first step:
x = (x1,..., xn,...), y = (y1,...,yn,...), and then x - y = (x1 - y1, ...,xn-yn,...)
to show xi,yi\in, we must show that \Sigma (xi -yi) &lt; \infty.
First, I broke up the squared quantity to get \Sigma (xi^2- 2xi*yi + yi^2).
Carrying the sumation through, \Sigma xi^2 &lt; \infty (as for yi^2).
But where I get stuck is how to show or determine that \Sigma xi*yi &lt; \infty.

So then the first three parts of the definition of a metric (d(p,p) = 0, p\rightarrow d(p,q) &gt; 0, and d(p,q) = d(q,p)) are easy enough to prove assuming xi-yi \in L2.
I get caught up again in proving that d(p,q) < d(p,r) + d(r,q).
I tried squaring both sides and distributing the summation, but found the resulting right hand side of the equation did not really simplify in a useful way. I'm not really sure where to go from there... any ideas for either of these roadblocks would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your missing ingredients are various facets of the 'Cauchy-Schwarz inequality'. Look that up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K