Initial speed of object sliding to a stop w/ air resistance

In summary, you are trying to solve a differential equation for the initial velocity of a large object sliding to a stop over a surface. However, your equation doesn't look right and you need help figuring out what's wrong.
  • #1
Bill M
11
0
Hey guys,

I'm looking to calculate the initial velocity of a large object sliding to a stop over a surface. This is easy without the drag force of the air, but I'd like to include that to prove a point in my research. As a quick background, I haven't done a differential equation in over a decade since I was an undergrad, so I'm trying to relearn on the fly.

Treating the vehicle as beginning at x=0 and moving in the postitive x direction a known distance D, the equation I came up with is

-fMg - kV2(x) = MV'(x)V(x)

The left side are the forces and the right side is mass times acceleration. f is the adjusted coeff. of friction, M is the object's mass, g is gravitational acceleration, k is a constant encompassing the other constants in front of v2 in the drag force.

I want to find the velocity V with respect to position x. The solution I came up with is:

[itex]V(x) = \sqrt{-\frac{Mfg}{k}(1-e^{\frac{-2k(x-D)}{M}})}[/itex]

This uses the fact that when x = D, V = 0. Does this look correct? My calculations make sense, but I want to be sure. I can include the intermediate steps if necessary, but that's a lot of typing!

Thanks from an old out of practice former physics nerd who now only uses this stuff on occasion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
  • #3
Writing A= -fmg and B= -k the equation is A+ Bv= mVV' so that (mVV')/(A+ BV)= 1 and (mVdV)/(A+ BV)= dt.

To solve that, integrate both sides: [itex]\int (MV)/(A+ BV) dV= \int dt= t+ C[/itex].

To integrate on the left, let, u= A+ BV so that du= Bdv and (1/B)du= dv. Also BV= u- A so that V= (u- A)/B. The integral becomes
[tex]\frac{M}{B^2}\int \frac{u- A}{u} du= \frac{M}{B^2}\int 1- \frac{A}{u}du[/tex]
[tex]\frac{M}{B^2}(u- Aln(u))= \frac{M}{B}(A+ BV- Aln(A+ BV))= t+ C[/tex].
 
  • #4
Flip,

V(x) is on the right side because the equation is in the form of forces = mass times acceleration. Since acceleration is V'(t) but I don't want it as a function of t, I want it as a function of position (x), I used these steps...

a = dV/dt

dV/dt = (dV/dx)(dx/dt) - chain rule

therefore, since velocity is just the derivative of position w/ resp to t...

a = dV/dx V, or as I have it written in my eqn., a is V'(x)V(x)

I attached my soltion to the eqn in .doc format with explanations...if someone could look at it and tell me if the logic/steps are good, I'd appreciate it.

Thank you for the assistance.
 

Attachments

  • DiffEqSoln.doc
    52 KB · Views: 165
  • #5
Ok, I missed that you have used the chain rule.

So, it looks like you have the differential equation

(1) [tex] -f - k v^2 = \frac{dv}{dx}v [/tex]

where I have combined the constants into just f and k. Separating and integrating I get

(2) [tex] dx = - \frac{v dv}{f+kv^2} [/tex]

and

(3) [tex] x_1 - x_0 = \frac{1}{2k}\left[ \log\left( f+kv^2 ) \right]_{v_0}^{v_1} [/tex]

which with [itex] x_0 = 0, x_1 = D, v_1 = 0 [/itex] inserted and rearranged gives

(4) [tex] v_0^2 = \frac{f}{k} \left( e^{2kD} -1 \right ) [/tex]

[STRIKE]I haven't looked at your attachment yet, but if you still get the same result as in your first post we then seem to disagree on the square root[/STRIKE].
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Yeah, if you wouldn't mind looking at it, I'd appreciate it. Like I said, it's been over 10 years since I've done this stuff!

The square root in my solution came from the fact that r v2 was in the equation and that after solving for that, I just wanted v.

You've made it simpler by combining the constants more that I did...I made it harder on myself. But, hey, this whole thing's been a challenge anyway!
 
  • #7
Bill M said:
The square root in my solution came from the fact that r v2 was in the equation and that after solving for that, I just wanted v.

Ah, my mistake, sorry. I can see that the square of v0 slipped out of my calculation somewhere between equation (3) and (4). You are correct in having a square root.

Yeah, if you wouldn't mind looking at it, I'd appreciate it.

It looks a slight bit more complicated than necessary, I think.

In your step 3 you have dx on both sides. I would instead use that, by definition, v'(x) = dv/dx, so that you can replace v'(x) by dv/dx, that is left-hand side gets dv and right-hand side gets dx, resulting in

(Step 3) [tex]\int \frac{v}{-f-kv^2}dv = \int dx[/tex]

In step 6 the two constants of integration can be combined into one constant (that would be valid for any sum of indefinite integrals). Alternatively, you can use definite integrals inserting the boundary values early on. In this case step 3 would have looked like

(Step 3') [tex] \int_{v}^{0} \frac{v}{-f-kv^2}dv = \int_{x}^{D} dx [/tex]
 
  • #8
Thanks, I'll try simplifying a bit. 10 years out of practice, I guess I'm glad that I got an answer at all! Thanks for your input.
 

1. What is the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance?

The initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance depends on various factors such as the mass of the object, the coefficient of friction, and the strength of the air resistance. It can be calculated using the formula v = u + at, where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time.

2. How does air resistance affect the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop?

Air resistance is a force that opposes the motion of an object through the air. As the object slides, the air resistance increases, causing a decrease in the initial speed. This is because the force of air resistance acts in the opposite direction of the object's motion, slowing it down.

3. Can the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance be greater than its initial speed without air resistance?

No, the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance can never be greater than its initial speed without air resistance. This is because air resistance always acts to slow down the object, reducing its speed.

4. How can the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance be minimized?

The initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance can be minimized by reducing the coefficient of friction and the strength of air resistance. This can be achieved by using smoother surfaces and reducing the object's surface area facing the direction of motion.

5. Is the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance affected by the shape or size of the object?

Yes, the shape and size of the object can affect the initial speed of an object sliding to a stop with air resistance. Objects with larger surface areas will experience more air resistance, slowing them down more quickly. Similarly, objects with streamlined shapes will experience less air resistance, allowing them to maintain a higher initial speed.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top