Initial Value problem 1st order ODE

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the differentiation of a first-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) and finding critical values. The general solution is given as y=(a+3)e^{t/2}-3e^{t/3}, and the critical points occur when the derivative dy/dt equals zero. The confusion arises regarding the statement that "each term on the RHS is independently zero," which leads to the conclusion that (a+3)/2=0. Participants clarify that setting the derivative to zero helps identify critical points, and they discuss the implications of the initial value a_0 in relation to the behavior of the solution. Ultimately, the mathematical reasoning behind finding critical values is emphasized, regardless of any physical interpretation of the ODE.
jellicorse
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have been trying to follow a solution to a problem I had but do not quite understand the whole thing. I wondered if anybody could clear it up for me.

Let a_0 be the initial value of 'a' for which the transition from one type of behaviour to another occurs.


The general solution to the ODE is y=(a+3)e^{\frac{t}{2}}-3e^{\frac{t}{3}}


So to get the critical value between a divergence in behaviour for this equation is when \frac{dy}{dt}=0

Differentiating the general solution gives:

\frac{dy}{dt}= \frac{1}{2}(a+3)e^{\frac{t}{2}}-e^{\frac{t}{3}}

0 =\frac{1}{2}(a+3)e^{\frac{t}{2}}-e^{\frac{t}{3}}



Up to here I understand the working. But the next step doesn't make any sense to me where they say "The functions of e^{\frac{t}{3}} and e^{\frac{t}{2}} are not equal to zero..." That's OK but I don't see how it leads to this: "...so each term on the RHS is independently zero"

According to their solution, this leads to \frac{1}{2}(a+3)=0, and so on.


There are two things I am having difficulty with here:

  • I don't understand what is meant by "each term on the RHS is independently zero". Surely if e^{\frac{t}{3}}\neq 0 then (\frac{a+3}{2})e^{\frac{t}{2}}=e^{\frac{t}{3}} to make the entire expression zero?



  • This is just a general example and it's not stated that it models anything in reality. But if this was a ODE to represent reality and 't' represented time, wouldn't it make sense to find the critical initial value by differentiating wrt 't' and then find the value of y(0), when t=0?


I would be very grateful if anyone could give me some pointers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jellicorse said:

Homework Statement



I have been trying to follow a solution to a problem I had but do not quite understand the whole thing. I wondered if anybody could clear it up for me.

Let a_0 be the initial value of 'a' for which the transition from one type of behaviour to another occurs.


The general solution to the ODE is y=(a+3)e^{\frac{t}{2}}-3e^{\frac{t}{3}}


So to get the critical value between a divergence in behaviour for this equation is when \frac{dy}{dt}=0

Differentiating the general solution gives:

\frac{dy}{dt}= \frac{1}{2}(a+3)e^{\frac{t}{2}}-e^{\frac{t}{3}}

0 =\frac{1}{2}(a+3)e^{\frac{t}{2}}-e^{\frac{t}{3}}


Up to here I understand the working. But the next step doesn't make any sense to me where they say "The functions of e^{\frac{t}{3}} and e^{\frac{t}{2}} are not equal to zero..." That's OK but I don't see how it leads to this: "...so each term on the RHS is independently zero"

According to their solution, this leads to \frac{1}{2}(a+3)=0, and so on.


There are two things I am having difficulty with here:

I don't understand what is meant by "each term on the RHS is independently zero".

I don't understand that either, and I cannot conceive of a meaning of "zero" for which it can be said that e^{t/3} is "zero", although the author does get the correct answer.

Surely if e^{\frac{t}{3}}\neq 0 then (\frac{a+3}{2})e^{\frac{t}{2}}=e^{\frac{t}{3}} to make the entire expression zero?[/LIST]

Setting the derivative to zero tells you the value(s) of t at which y(t) has a critical point. You can then try to work out whether, depending on the value of a, there are any critical points in t > 0 and, if so, whether they are local maxima, minima, or points of inflection by considering the second derivative. That information will tell you whether y is eventually increasing or decreasing.

Alternatively you can observe that y(t) = e^{t/2}(3 + a - 3e^{-t/6}), so that y \to + \infty if 3 + a > 0 and y \to -\infty if 3 + a \leq 0, so the critical value is a = -3.

  • This is just a general example and it's not stated that it models anything in reality. But if this was a ODE to represent reality and 't' represented time, wouldn't it make sense to find the critical initial value by differentiating wrt 't' and then find the value of y(0), when t=0?

Having found the critical values of the constant of integration by some means, you can then indeed find corresponding critical initial values by substituting them into the general solution and setting t = 0. That's what the author has done here, by the cunning method of writing Ae^{t/2} - 3e^{t/3} as (3 + a)e^{t/2} - 3e^{t/3} so that y(0) = a = A - 3.

Whether the ODE is asserted to a be model of any physical system is entirely irrelevant here. Critical values are critical because the mathematics says they are.
 
Thanks a lot pasmith. I'm beginning to understand it now.

Just in terms of finding the critical value of the constant of integration I think I can see that
you can observe that y(t)=e^{\frac{t}{2}}(3+a−3e^{-\frac{t}{6}}), so that y→+∞ if 3+a>0 and y→−∞ if 3+a≤0, so the critical value is a=−3.

But I'm not too sure about any alternative way to find a_0.

It seems that in all the examples I have done up until now the equilibrium solution has occurred where c=0. I don't know if this is just a co-incidence: if it isn't, it would make finding the critical value for the constant of integration easy: just set it so that the constant of integration =0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K