Inquiry About Inertia: What Causes It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
Inertia is fundamentally linked to mass, which is an inertial property that dictates an object's resistance to changes in its state of motion. The discussion raises questions about the underlying causes of mass, suggesting that it may relate to forces, time, or gravity, but ultimately acknowledges that the true nature of mass remains uncertain. The inquiry extends to the philosophical aspect of causality, questioning why there is a need for a cause at all. This reflects a broader existential curiosity about the fundamental characteristics of the universe and the particles within it. The conversation highlights the complexity and mystery surrounding these foundational concepts in physics.
GarryS
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
What is the cause of Inertia?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GarryS said:
What is the cause of Inertia?
What is the cause of the need for a cause?
 
I just read this two minutes ago while reseaching the "standard kilogram"... so I'll post it here for reference:

The kilogram is a unit of mass, the measurement of which corresponds to the general, everyday notion of how “heavy” something is. Physically speaking, mass is an inertial property; that is, the tendency of an object to remain at constant velocity unless acted upon by an outside force.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram#Stability_of_the_international_prototype_kilogram

What is the cause of mass? forces? time? gravity? nobody really knows...it's a characteristic of our universe...and without any of them we'd not be here to observe and question. We can't even figure out yet why we have the fundamental particles that we observe.
 
A.T. said:
What is the cause of the need for a cause?

Ha Ha Ha Ha...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top