Insanely hard differential equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a complex differential equation related to the equilibrium size of a planetesimal, where the material's density is pressure dependent. Participants explore various methods for finding solutions, including numerical and analytical approaches, while addressing the challenges posed by the nonlinearity of the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the differential equation and seeks assistance in solving it.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about how to begin tackling the problem.
  • Some participants suggest testing specific functions (e.g., polynomials) to see if they yield useful results.
  • A participant proposes a transformation to simplify the equation but admits to limited progress.
  • There are suggestions for numerical integration, with some preferring an analytic solution instead.
  • One participant mentions the potential use of Laplace transformations, while another disputes its applicability due to the equation's nonlinearity.
  • Another participant discusses using polynomial approximations for an approximate solution, noting the complexity involved.
  • Power series are suggested as a possible method for finding an analytical solution, though concerns about convergence are raised.
  • Questions are posed regarding the physical validity of the equation and its units.
  • A participant inquires about methods to verify if algebraic functions can be solutions to the equation, referencing a previous problem as an example.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions on the best approach to solve the equation, with no consensus reached on a single method. Disagreement exists regarding the applicability of Laplace transformations and the feasibility of finding an analytical solution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenges posed by the nonlinearity of the differential equation and the potential limitations of various proposed methods, including numerical versus analytical approaches.

tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
I'm trying to find the equilibrium size of a planetesimal which is made of a material whose density is pressure dependent. (quite a mouthful)

I have to solve this differential equation:

[tex]y(x^2y''+2xy')+2y^2+bxy'=ax^2y^3+(xy')^2+by[/tex]

where a and b are constants.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea where to start. :(
 
Hmm, the y3 is an issue.

Here is what I would do (after testing some functions like polynomials, or polynomial*exponential and so on): get everything on one side, see what y=1, y=x, y=1/x, y=x2 and so on produce as result and see if you can combine them to get a zero somehow.
 
$$(1) y(x^2 y''+2xy)-(xy')^2 = y(x^2 y')' - (x^2 y')y' = (x^2 y'/y)' y^2 $$

$$(2) bxy' -by = b (y/x)' x^2$$

$$(3) 2y^2 -ax^2 y^3 = y^2 (2- ax^2 y) $$

Your equation is: $$ (1)+(2)+(3) = 0$$

So you get:

$$ (x^2 y'/y)' /x^2 + b(y/x)' /y^2 + (2/x^2 - ay) = 0$$

I wish I could translate all this equation into a derivative of some expression, but I don't see exactly how to do it here. Anyone?
 
It should be straightforward to integrate numerically. Is a numerical solution acceptable, or do you want an analytic expression?
 
phyzguy said:
It should be straightforward to integrate numerically. Is a numerical solution acceptable, or do you want an analytic expression?
An analytic expression would be best.
 
Absolutely an analytic expression. I mean just any old body can numerically integrate it. This is what I came up with early this morning:

Let [itex]u=x^2y'[/itex] so that:

[tex]ydu+2y^2+bxy'=ax^2 y^3+y'u+by[/tex]

then I went to bed. Sadly, that's the best I got.

. . . hummmm, wonder if anyone else is lookin' at this problem? :)

Edit: Oh yeah, I say we let a=1 and b=1 or whatever neat numbers that might make it possible to solve for a particular case for starters.
 
Last edited:
Well you could use Laplace transformation. It's good for this type of equations.
 
Djokara said:
Well you could use Laplace transformation. It's good for this type of equations.
NO, it's not. The Laplace transform only works for linear equations (and a few non-linear equations that can be easily linearized).
 
  • #10
I was intrigued by this equation when you first posted it. This equation is very nonlinear, and I tried to do an approximate solution using an expansion, but even that is difficult because of a couple of discrete convolutions. It may be best (If you truly cannot obtain an analytic solution) to substitute a polynomial of some specified degree (This depends on how accurate you want to be) and match terms.
 
  • #11
I think an "analytical" solution, if all else fails, can be computed via power series. I realize we'll have to cube a power series and will have other messy terms, but I am optimistic we can obtain one, however I suspect it will have a small radius of convergence. Still, approaching it via power series would be quite an interesting approach.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Since this equation is from physics, how do the physical units work out? Does the equation make sense as a physical law in that respect?
 
  • #13
May I ask if there is any way to check if an algebraic function is a solution to this equation? The reason I ask is that I've noticed sometimes they are solutions to highly-nonlinear equations. Take for example a problem solved in here earlier:

[tex]1+p^2-yp'p-2y(1+p^2)^{3/2}=0[/tex]

Well, it turns out that the algebraic function, [itex]p(y)[/itex] defined implicitly by:

[tex]f(y,p)=(y^2-2c_1 y^2-y^2+c_1^2)+(y^4-2y^2+1)p^2=0[/tex]

is a solution. So, suppose we start with the equation:

[tex]1+p^2-yp'p-2y(1+p^2)^{3/2}=0[/tex]

is there a way to determine if the function:

[tex]f(y,p)=a_0(y)+a_2(y) p^2=0[/tex]
where [itex]a_i(y)[/itex] are polynomials in y, is a solution to this equation? And if so, is there a way likewise to determine if

[tex]f(x,y)=a_0(x)+a_1(x)y+\cdots+a_n(x)y^n=0[/tex]

is a solution to:

[tex]y(x^2 y ′′ +2xy ′ )+2y^2 +bxy ′ =ax^2 y^3 +(xy ′ )^ 2 +by[/tex]

Suppose that is the assignment:

Given [itex]g(x,y,y',y'')=0[/itex], determine if there are solutions [itex]y(x)[/itex] that can be written in the form:
[tex]f(x,y)=a_0(x)+a_1(x)y+\cdots+a_n(x)y^n=0[/tex]
I think that's an interesting problem don't you guys think?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K